anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 10:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

New tui does not let running agents using @agent_name. #2537

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00 by yindo · 8 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @SKozar on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Description

New TUI in versions 1.0.x doesn’t allow running agents using @agent_name. In older versions (0.15.x), it works correctly.

In versions 1.0.x, writing @ provides autocompletion to select files but doesn’t show agents. If you ignore autocompletion and type the agent name directly, it doesn’t recognize the name in the prompt and treats it as part of the input.

This is an issue when creating custom agents meant to function as subtasks.

According to the (documentation)[https://opencode.ai/docs/agents/], it should still work?

OpenCode version

1.0.x

Steps to reproduce

  1. run opencode
  2. switch to build mode
  3. write prompt @plan create plan to implement hello world application in python
  4. TUI will accept it as just regular prompt in build mode and would not invoke @plan agent.

Screenshot and/or share link

Image

Operating System

macOS 17.7

Terminal

iTerm2. Problem is the same with regular Terminal.

Originally created by @SKozar on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ### Description New TUI in versions 1.0.x doesn’t allow running agents using @agent_name. In older versions (0.15.x), it works correctly. In versions 1.0.x, writing @ provides autocompletion to select files but doesn’t show agents. If you ignore autocompletion and type the agent name directly, it doesn’t recognize the name in the prompt and treats it as part of the input. This is an issue when creating custom agents meant to function as subtasks. According to the (documentation)[https://opencode.ai/docs/agents/], it should still work? ### OpenCode version 1.0.x ### Steps to reproduce 1. run `opencode` 2. switch to build mode 3. write prompt `@plan create plan to implement hello world application in python` 4. TUI will accept it as just regular prompt in build mode and would not invoke @plan agent. ### Screenshot and/or share link <img width="1728" height="1022" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b584e24d-0c29-4d13-8027-b58530bcb0ca" /> ### Operating System macOS 17.7 ### Terminal iTerm2. Problem is the same with regular Terminal.
yindo added the opentuibug labels 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured?

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@AbbasSrour commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

I can confirm as well, the @ is not showing subagents for me also.

@AbbasSrour commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): I can confirm as well, the @ is not showing subagents for me also.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured?

i have configured agent named @refactor. It does work too.

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): > is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured? i have configured agent named @refactor. It does work too.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured?

yes, it's default plan mode in example

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): > is this the built in plan mode? you don't have anything configured? yes, it's default plan mode in example
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

can i see your config?

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): can i see your config?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

    return agents
      .filter((agent) => !agent.builtIn && agent.mode !== "primary")
@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): ``` return agents .filter((agent) => !agent.builtIn && agent.mode !== "primary") ```
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025):

this is how we check

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Nov 3, 2025): this is how we check
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:36:08 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025):

this is how we check

In my use case, I've redefined the default @build agent to be a subagent. I did this to prevent unintentional switches to build mode without compromising the planning process.

But I'd still like to have the option to run simple tasks that don’t require planning by using @build do some task.

Is it possible to modify the check and remove the restriction on using built-in agents as subagents? Is there any reason for this limitation that I’m not understanding?

Thank you.

@SKozar commented on GitHub (Nov 4, 2025): > this is how we check In my use case, I've redefined the default @build agent to be a subagent. I did this to prevent unintentional switches to build mode without compromising the planning process. But I'd still like to have the option to run simple tasks that don’t require planning by using `@build do some task`. Is it possible to modify the check and remove the restriction on using built-in agents as subagents? Is there any reason for this limitation that I’m not understanding? Thank you.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label bug opentui
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#2537
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?