anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

[FEATURE]:Here's a chance to get 1 billion free tokens from bailing llm—should we consider integrating it? #3077

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @codegrandpa on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025).

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

Feature request

Description:
While exploring major agent platforms over the past few days, I noticed Ant Group’s T-Box is running a monthly promotion: each user gets 1 billion free tokens per month. The quota can be used for:

agent conversations
image generation
knowledge-base retrieval
plugin invocation
They provide an OpenAPI and a Python SDK.
Link: https://alipaytbox.yuque.com/sxs0ba/ling/intro

Question:
Should we consider integrating Bailing so users can take advantage of the free monthly quota?

Image
Originally created by @codegrandpa on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025). ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request Feature request Description: While exploring major agent platforms over the past few days, I noticed Ant Group’s T-Box is running a monthly promotion: each user gets 1 billion free tokens per month. The quota can be used for: agent conversations image generation knowledge-base retrieval plugin invocation They provide an OpenAPI and a Python SDK. Link: https://alipaytbox.yuque.com/sxs0ba/ling/intro Question: Should we consider integrating Bailing so users can take advantage of the free monthly quota? <img width="2874" height="1570" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1e819030-7622-4a9c-9d51-6be928c93b1c" />
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #4581: [FEATURE]: Ollama Cloud AUTH Login - request to add direct cloud provider integration
  • #4474: [FEATURE]: Add support for Anthropic models in Azure AI Foundry - adds new provider support
  • #4600: [FEATURE]: Login to ChatGPT account - request for OAuth-style authentication
  • #4563: [FEATURE]: Add Cohere as a provider - request for new LLM provider integration

While these aren't exact duplicates of the T-Box integration request, they represent similar feature requests for adding new LLM provider integrations to OpenCode. T-Box (Ant Group) would follow a similar pattern to these requests.

Feel free to ignore if the free token promotion aspect of T-Box is the primary concern rather than provider integration in general.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #4581: [FEATURE]: Ollama Cloud AUTH Login - request to add direct cloud provider integration - #4474: [FEATURE]: Add support for Anthropic models in Azure AI Foundry - adds new provider support - #4600: [FEATURE]: Login to ChatGPT account - request for OAuth-style authentication - #4563: [FEATURE]: Add Cohere as a provider - request for new LLM provider integration While these aren't exact duplicates of the T-Box integration request, they represent similar feature requests for adding new LLM provider integrations to OpenCode. T-Box (Ant Group) would follow a similar pattern to these requests. Feel free to ignore if the free token promotion aspect of T-Box is the primary concern rather than provider integration in general.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025):

You can easily setup a custom provider and try it out yourself without any code changes from us

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Nov 23, 2025): You can easily setup a custom provider and try it out yourself without any code changes from us
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@codegrandpa commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2025):

You can easily setup a custom provider and try it out yourself without any code changes from us

Thanks for the reply. That said,Bailing’s models—ling‑1t, ling‑flash, ring‑1t, and more—have notable strengths in coding and math, so it’s worth letting more users experience them.
Am I able to open a PR to add Bailing as an opt‑in provider?

@codegrandpa commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2025): > You can easily setup a custom provider and try it out yourself without any code changes from us Thanks for the reply. That said,Bailing’s models—ling‑1t, ling‑flash, ring‑1t, and more—have notable strengths in coding and math, so it’s worth letting more users experience them. Am I able to open a PR to add Bailing as an opt‑in provider?
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:38:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2025):

Model / Provider api comes from here: https://github.com/sst/models.dev

PRs welcome

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Nov 24, 2025): Model / Provider api comes from here: https://github.com/sst/models.dev PRs welcome
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label discussion
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#3077
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?