anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 10:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Forking a message should retain the input like in /undo #3529

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:40:32 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:40:32 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @JosXa on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub.

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

When I click one of my previous messages and fork, I expect that message's content to be taken into the new session.
Case in point: When your conversation only contains a single message (yours) and the LLM is working on it, then forking and having a completely empty history makes no sense at all.

I would expect clicking fork to behave the same way as undo, where it puts the message you clicked into the input box.

Use case: Try one prompt against different models to compare performance.

Originally created by @JosXa on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025). Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub. ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request When I click one of my previous messages and fork, I expect that message's content to be taken into the new session. Case in point: When your conversation only contains a single message (yours) and the LLM is working on it, then forking and having a completely empty history makes no sense at all. I would expect clicking fork to behave the same way as undo, where it puts the message you clicked into the input box. Use case: Try one prompt against different models to compare performance.
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 17:40:32 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:40:32 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:40:32 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #4186: "revert message" should place reverted message in the prompt input - similar feature request about placing message content in the input box
  • #3071: "/timeline UX is confusing" - related issue about timeline behavior and message editing

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 13, 2025): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #4186: "revert message" should place reverted message in the prompt input - similar feature request about placing message content in the input box - #3071: "/timeline UX is confusing" - related issue about timeline behavior and message editing Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label discussion
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#3529
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?