[FEATURE]: Multiple model usage with git worktrees #4101

Open
opened 2026-02-16 17:42:36 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @TaylorJonesTRT on GitHub (Jan 2, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

Now that there is a PR for git worktree support is there anyway we can get the ability to use multiple models to work on the same plan in their own way ala Cursor? Each model would get it's own worktree dir and work on the same plan and then the end user could choose the best approach that they like. That worktree would then be accepted / merged into whatever branch they were built off of and the others removed at any time.

Originally created by @TaylorJonesTRT on GitHub (Jan 2, 2026). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request Now that there is a PR for git worktree support is there anyway we can get the ability to use multiple models to work on the same plan in their own way ala Cursor? Each model would get it's own worktree dir and work on the same plan and then the end user could choose the best approach that they like. That worktree would then be accepted / merged into whatever branch they were built off of and the others removed at any time.
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 17:42:36 -05:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #4789: LLM Council support - proposes running multiple LLMs together to increase usefulness
  • #4790: Multiple AI models working concurrently with settings - discusses autonomous system with multiple agents creating a project together
  • #6078: Support multi-LLM parallel review for /reviews command - suggests executing review tasks in parallel with multiple models

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 2, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #4789: LLM Council support - proposes running multiple LLMs together to increase usefulness - #4790: Multiple AI models working concurrently with settings - discusses autonomous system with multiple agents creating a project together - #6078: Support multi-LLM parallel review for /reviews command - suggests executing review tasks in parallel with multiple models Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
Author
Owner

@TaylorJonesTRT commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2026):

https://cursor.com/docs/configuration/worktrees

@TaylorJonesTRT commented on GitHub (Jan 3, 2026): https://cursor.com/docs/configuration/worktrees
Author
Owner

@miguelnavarro89 commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026):

Vote for this, this would be really awesome!!! Keep up the great work Opencode guys! @thdxr

@miguelnavarro89 commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026): Vote for this, this would be really awesome!!! Keep up the great work Opencode guys! @thdxr
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#4101