[FEATURE]: I hope we can support litellm. #4422

Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:43:44 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @chensanle on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

I hope you can support litellm.

Originally created by @chensanle on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request I hope you can support litellm.
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 17:43:44 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:43:44 -05:00
Author
Owner

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #7199: How do I setup open code with litellm?
  • #665: Improve documentation for self-hosted LLMs
  • #6346: Devstral via LiteLLM OpenAI-compatible fails with invalid_request_message_order on first file edit
  • #6244: Response terminates prematurely when using Gemini 3 via LiteLLM
  • #6473: applyCaching called too freely, causes LiteLLM to fail
  • #2915: LiteLLM error: Anthropic doesn't support tool calling without tools= param specified

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 8, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #7199: How do I setup open code with litellm? - #665: Improve documentation for self-hosted LLMs - #6346: Devstral via LiteLLM OpenAI-compatible fails with invalid_request_message_order on first file edit - #6244: Response terminates prematurely when using Gemini 3 via LiteLLM - #6473: applyCaching called too freely, causes LiteLLM to fail - #2915: LiteLLM error: Anthropic doesn't support tool calling without tools= param specified Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
Author
Owner

@harshpreet931 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2026):

@chensanle hey you closed this issue yesterday did you find a way to connect it?

@harshpreet931 commented on GitHub (Jan 9, 2026): @chensanle hey you closed this issue yesterday did you find a way to connect it?
Author
Owner

@chensanle commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2026):

@chensanle hey you closed this issue yesterday did you find a way to connect it?

“This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues.”
Hey, I didn’t find a suitable way to connect it

@chensanle commented on GitHub (Feb 8, 2026): > [@chensanle](https://github.com/chensanle) hey you closed this issue yesterday did you find a way to connect it? “This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues.” Hey, I didn’t find a suitable way to connect it
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#4422