anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 18:25:32 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

[FEATURE]: enable responses API in openai compatible provider #6947

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @scratchmex on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

We need an option for OpenAI compatible models like suggested in https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/5866 as well. I think it should be the default to use responses API for models that are intenfed to be used that way, like codex, same as proposed in above issue

Originally created by @scratchmex on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request We need an option for OpenAI compatible models like suggested in https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/issues/5866 as well. I think it should be the default to use responses API for models that are intenfed to be used that way, like codex, same as proposed in above issue
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #5866: [BUG]: GitHub Copilot Responses API routing for GPT-5+ - Already proposes adding a useResponsesApi option for OpenAI-compatible providers with similar intent
  • #7793: [Feature Request] Support traditional Chat Completions API for OpenAI provider - Related discussion on routing between Chat Completions and Responses APIs for OpenAI-compatible providers
  • #8622: gpt-5.2-codex TypeError: sdk.responses is not a function - Related bug where responses API is expected but not available

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 20, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #5866: [BUG]: GitHub Copilot Responses API routing for GPT-5+ - Already proposes adding a useResponsesApi option for OpenAI-compatible providers with similar intent - #7793: [Feature Request] Support traditional Chat Completions API for OpenAI provider - Related discussion on routing between Chat Completions and Responses APIs for OpenAI-compatible providers - #8622: gpt-5.2-codex TypeError: sdk.responses is not a function - Related bug where responses API is expected but not available Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Vonfry commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026):

For responses api, you can use "@ai-sdk/openai" directly, IMO.

For example:

custom-provider = {
  npm = "@ai-sdk/openai";
  name = "OpenAI proxy";
    options = {
      apiKey = "{file:...}";
      baseURL = "https://.../v1";
    };
    models = {
      "gpt-5.2-codex" = {
         name = "GPT!";
        };
     };
 };
@Vonfry commented on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026): For responses api, you can use "@ai-sdk/openai" directly, IMO. For example: ```nix custom-provider = { npm = "@ai-sdk/openai"; name = "OpenAI proxy"; options = { apiKey = "{file:...}"; baseURL = "https://.../v1"; }; models = { "gpt-5.2-codex" = { name = "GPT!"; }; }; }; ```
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@DeluxeOwl commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026):

The solution above doesn't show reasoning

@DeluxeOwl commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026): The solution above doesn't show reasoning
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:05:41 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Vonfry commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026):

Do you try following configurations:

options = {
  reasoningEffort = "xhigh";
  textVerbosity = "high";
  reasoningSummary = "detailed";
};
@Vonfry commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026): Do you try following configurations: ```nix options = { reasoningEffort = "xhigh"; textVerbosity = "high"; reasoningSummary = "detailed"; }; ```
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label discussion
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#6947
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?