anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

xhigh not available for GPT-5.2 or GPT-5.2-Codex via Github CoPilot #7070

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00 by yindo · 13 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @dlukt on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub.

Description

I specifically subscribed to Github CoPilot because of your announcement that opencode now supports Github CoPilot as a provider and all the models.
In codex-cli or copilot-cli xhigh reasoning is available.
In opencode, cycling with CTRL+t only low, medium and high are available, xhigh is not.

For other providers xhigh is available.

Plugins

No response

OpenCode version

No response

Steps to reproduce

Try selecting xhigh reasoning for the mentioned models

Screenshot and/or share link

No response

Operating System

No response

Terminal

No response

Originally created by @dlukt on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026). Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub. ### Description I specifically subscribed to Github CoPilot because of your announcement that opencode now supports Github CoPilot as a provider and all the models. In codex-cli or copilot-cli xhigh reasoning is available. In opencode, cycling with CTRL+t only low, medium and high are available, xhigh is not. For other providers xhigh is available. ### Plugins _No response_ ### OpenCode version _No response_ ### Steps to reproduce Try selecting xhigh reasoning for the mentioned models ### Screenshot and/or share link _No response_ ### Operating System _No response_ ### Terminal _No response_
yindo added the bugzen labels 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026):

For keybind-related issues, please also check our pinned keybinds documentation: #4997

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 21, 2026): For keybind-related issues, please also check our pinned keybinds documentation: #4997
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@bjoernzosel commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

now it's available - awesome:

Image
@bjoernzosel commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): now it's available - awesome: <img width="714" height="355" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6d115eea-ce5c-4e86-8d05-3e745bd8cb6d" />
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@divaltor commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

now it's available - awesome:
Image

You show us picture from OpenAI provider, not Github Copilot

It's still unavailable
Image

@divaltor commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): > now it's available - awesome: > <img alt="Image" width="714" height="355" src="https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/30299142/539276109-6d115eea-ce5c-4e86-8d05-3e745bd8cb6d.png?jwt=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.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.YqOUdgjp_RuGt7SNiwidOrte2CqcFm2Ef1wE7WdONSM"> You show us picture from OpenAI provider, not Github Copilot It's still unavailable <img width="749" height="335" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/870e89f7-214e-46e1-8eda-cf53707bbb2d" />
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@bjoernzosel commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

yes you are right... my bad

@bjoernzosel commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): yes you are right... my bad
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

Does copilot only allow that reasoning level for the 2 gpt-5.2 models? I need to find where this is stated so I can make sure others also match

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): Does copilot only allow that reasoning level for the 2 gpt-5.2 models? I need to find where this is stated so I can make sure others also match
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Arthur742Ramos commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

GitHub Copilot allows setting xhigh for gpt-5.1-codex-max and get-5.2* models. I sent a PR to fix this issue.

@Arthur742Ramos commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): GitHub Copilot allows setting xhigh for gpt-5.1-codex-max and get-5.2* models. I sent a PR to fix this issue.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

What Arthur wrote, xhigh was added since 5.1 codex max

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): What Arthur wrote, xhigh was added since 5.1 codex max
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026):

Merged @Arthur742Ramos pr, should be fixed in next release

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 22, 2026): Merged @Arthur742Ramos pr, should be fixed in next release
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026):

I'm on 1.1.34 and it's still high only

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026): I'm on 1.1.34 and it's still high only
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026):

The PR wasn't merged

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026): The PR wasn't merged
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@Sewer56 commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026):

@rekram1-node

FYI

@Sewer56 commented on GitHub (Jan 23, 2026): @rekram1-node - https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/pull/10092 was not in fact merged FYI
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026):

? wdym by not merged...

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026): ? wdym by not merged...
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:06:05 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026):

when we commented that it wasn't merged

@dlukt commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026): when we commented that it wasn't merged
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label bug zen
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#7070
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?