anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 10:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Nix darwin hashes unreliable from Linux runner #8103

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 18:09:10 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:09:10 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @ndrwstn on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Summary

Since PR #9309 switched nix hash updates to a single Linux runner, Darwin hashes are unreliable. Large bun.lock changes (around v1.1.43+) appear to have broken the cross-computed hashes, and nix-darwin now fails with hash mismatches.

System

  • macOS 26.2 (Build 25C56)
  • Darwin Kernel 25.2.0, arm64 (Apple Silicon)

Error example

> nix run github:anomalyco/opencode/v1.1.47 --refresh
error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/9a6m0j4bq1pambplyfn75ip291psq4v9-opencode-node_modules-1.1.47-6cd2a68.drv':
         specified: sha256-20RGG2GkUItCzD67gDdoSLfexttM8abS//FKO9bfjoM=
            got:    sha256-yvrNFmYeMYviyCVSahuLFXmyoIMT136WoJ0MEbk+AD8=
error: Cannot build '/nix/store/4idyk603r28knk02k1lbnzc3dlypahgf-opencode-1.1.47-6cd2a68.drv'.
       Reason: 1 dependency failed.
       Output paths:
         /nix/store/k0bazhcbmxbhg5zsbffypn5nm5crh7g6-opencode-1.1.47-6cd2a68

Request

Please restore macOS runners for darwin hash computation (x86_64-darwin, aarch64-darwin) or make the derivation host-independent.

Related to #9309.

Originally created by @ndrwstn on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ## Summary Since PR #9309 switched nix hash updates to a single Linux runner, Darwin hashes are unreliable. Large bun.lock changes (around v1.1.43+) appear to have broken the cross-computed hashes, and nix-darwin now fails with hash mismatches. ## System - macOS 26.2 (Build 25C56) - Darwin Kernel 25.2.0, arm64 (Apple Silicon) ## Error example ``` > nix run github:anomalyco/opencode/v1.1.47 --refresh error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/9a6m0j4bq1pambplyfn75ip291psq4v9-opencode-node_modules-1.1.47-6cd2a68.drv': specified: sha256-20RGG2GkUItCzD67gDdoSLfexttM8abS//FKO9bfjoM= got: sha256-yvrNFmYeMYviyCVSahuLFXmyoIMT136WoJ0MEbk+AD8= error: Cannot build '/nix/store/4idyk603r28knk02k1lbnzc3dlypahgf-opencode-1.1.47-6cd2a68.drv'. Reason: 1 dependency failed. Output paths: /nix/store/k0bazhcbmxbhg5zsbffypn5nm5crh7g6-opencode-1.1.47-6cd2a68 ``` ## Request Please restore macOS runners for darwin hash computation (x86_64-darwin, aarch64-darwin) or make the derivation host-independent. Related to #9309.
yindo added the nix label 2026-02-16 18:09:10 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 18:09:10 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:09:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #8977: Bug: Nix hashes for nodes_modules incorrectly generated - discusses race conditions in CI hash computation
  • #8742: Nix build fails on aarch64-linux and x86_64-darwin: missing nodeModules - related to missing platform-specific hashes
  • #7344: Nix package: hash mismatch in node_modules fixed-output derivation - similar hash mismatch errors

Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Jan 30, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #8977: Bug: Nix hashes for nodes_modules incorrectly generated - discusses race conditions in CI hash computation - #8742: Nix build fails on aarch64-linux and x86_64-darwin: missing nodeModules - related to missing platform-specific hashes - #7344: Nix package: hash mismatch in node_modules fixed-output derivation - similar hash mismatch errors Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:09:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@ndrwstn commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026):

Wanted to tag @gigamonster256 since he was the person working on the nix actions.

@ndrwstn commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026): Wanted to tag @gigamonster256 since he was the person working on the nix actions.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:09:11 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@gigamonster256 commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026):

running jj bisect run --range "(v1.1.30..dev@upstream) & files(nix/hashes.json)" --command "nix build .#opencode.node_modules" on aarch64-darwin points to 8ce19f8c as the first bad CI update... trying to figure out why that is the case

@gigamonster256 commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026): running `jj bisect run --range "(v1.1.30..dev@upstream) & files(nix/hashes.json)" --command "nix build .#opencode.node_modules"` on aarch64-darwin points to 8ce19f8c as the first bad CI update... trying to figure out why that is the case
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label nix
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#8103
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?