anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

opencode fails to run due to missing GLIBC versions #8958

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-16 18:11:15 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:11:15 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @chongg039 on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub.

Description

When running opencode, it fails with the following error messages indicating missing GLIBC versions:

 1 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by opencode)
 2 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.24' not found (required by opencode)
 3 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by opencode)

Environment:

 - OS: Enterprise Linux (RHEL 7 compatible)
 - Architecture: x86_64
 - Kernel: 4.19.91
 - GLIBC Version: 2.17

Many enterprise environments still use distributions based on RHEL 7 with GLIBC 2.17, making it difficult to run binaries compiled against newer GLIBC versions.

Plugins

No response

OpenCode version

No response

Steps to reproduce

No response

Screenshot and/or share link

Image

Operating System

Linux v43h05406.sqa.na131 4.19.91-013

Terminal

No response

Originally created by @chongg039 on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026). Originally assigned to: @rekram1-node on GitHub. ### Description When running opencode, it fails with the following error messages indicating missing GLIBC versions: 1 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by opencode) 2 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.24' not found (required by opencode) 3 opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by opencode) Environment: - OS: Enterprise Linux (RHEL 7 compatible) - Architecture: x86_64 - Kernel: 4.19.91 - GLIBC Version: 2.17 Many enterprise environments still use distributions based on RHEL 7 with GLIBC 2.17, making it difficult to run binaries compiled against newer GLIBC versions. ### Plugins _No response_ ### OpenCode version _No response_ ### Steps to reproduce _No response_ ### Screenshot and/or share link <img width="1448" height="168" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/835b8560-d3e2-488b-a46d-9fd16dc60c97" /> ### Operating System Linux v43h05406.sqa.na131 4.19.91-013 ### Terminal _No response_
yindo added the bugperf labels 2026-02-16 18:11:15 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:11:15 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026):

This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

  • #4908: GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by opencode) - Similar GLIBC compatibility issue on CentOS 7
  • #3045: GLIBC_2.25 Required -> Need An Alternative - User requesting alternatives for older GLIBC versions

Both issues address the same underlying problem: OpenCode binaries are compiled against newer GLIBC versions that aren't available on enterprise systems running RHEL 7 or CentOS 7 with GLIBC 2.17.

If this is a new instance or has additional context not covered in the existing issues, please clarify the difference.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 10, 2026): This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check: - #4908: GLIBC_2.18' not found (required by opencode) - Similar GLIBC compatibility issue on CentOS 7 - #3045: GLIBC_2.25 Required -> Need An Alternative - User requesting alternatives for older GLIBC versions Both issues address the same underlying problem: OpenCode binaries are compiled against newer GLIBC versions that aren't available on enterprise systems running RHEL 7 or CentOS 7 with GLIBC 2.17. If this is a new instance or has additional context not covered in the existing issues, please clarify the difference.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label bug perf
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#8958
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?