anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-22 02:05:26 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

[FEATURE]: Add a new experimental "hashline" edit mode #9214

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-16 18:11:55 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:11:55 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @watzon on GitHub (Feb 12, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Feature hasn't been suggested before.

  • I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before.

Describe the enhancement you want to request

Hashline is a new edit mode just introduced to the oh-my-pi agentic coding tool (a fork of Pi). In a lot of cases it speeds up edits and reduces rejected edits from diffs not matching. Having tested it out myself in oh-my-pi I really want to bring the feature over to OpenCode.

References:

Originally created by @watzon on GitHub (Feb 12, 2026). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ### Feature hasn't been suggested before. - [x] I have verified this feature I'm about to request hasn't been suggested before. ### Describe the enhancement you want to request Hashline is a new edit mode just introduced to the oh-my-pi agentic coding tool (a fork of Pi). In a lot of cases it speeds up edits and reduces rejected edits from diffs not matching. Having tested it out myself in oh-my-pi I really want to bring the feature over to OpenCode. References: - https://blog.can.ac/2026/02/12/the-harness-problem/ - https://github.com/can1357/oh-my-pi
yindo added the discussion label 2026-02-16 18:11:55 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 18:11:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2026):

Thanks for the feature request! Before implementation, please check if this might relate to existing issues addressing similar edit tool challenges:

  • #12406: Proposes using checksums for file verification (similar solution to hashline)
  • #5840: Tracking issue for edit tool reliability, includes discussion of content-based hashing
  • #4406: Discusses the underlying need to re-read files between edits

These issues explore similar solutions to the 'rejected edits' problem that hashline addresses. Linking them might help the team prioritize and coordinate implementation.

@github-actions[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 12, 2026): Thanks for the feature request! Before implementation, please check if this might relate to existing issues addressing similar edit tool challenges: - **#12406**: Proposes using checksums for file verification (similar solution to hashline) - **#5840**: Tracking issue for edit tool reliability, includes discussion of content-based hashing - **#4406**: Discusses the underlying need to re-read files between edits These issues explore similar solutions to the 'rejected edits' problem that hashline addresses. Linking them might help the team prioritize and coordinate implementation.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label discussion
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#9214
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?