anomalyco/opencode
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode.git synced 2026-07-24 04:01:10 -04:00
Code Issues 5.9k Packages Projects Releases 19 Wiki Activity

Model Compatibility Chart and Recommendations #958

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @joshmedeski on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub.

Background

First, I want to express my gratitude to the team for the excellent work on OpenCode so far. The project has tremendous potential, and I'm eager to make it my primary AI TUI for development work.

Problem Statement

I'm experiencing challenges with model selection and reliability that are impacting my productivity:

  • Inconsistent model performance: Tool call failures are frequent with certain models, leading to unproductive sessions
  • Lack of guidance: Without clear documentation on which models work best with OpenCode, I'm essentially guessing
  • Switching costs: Mid-conversation model switching often fails, making it crucial to select the right model upfront
  • Time and cost waste: Failed interactions result in both wasted API credits and development time

Proposed Solution

I'd like to request the creation of a Model Compatibility Chart that includes:

Core Information

  • ✅ Compatibility Status: Fully supported, partially supported, or experimental
  • 🧠 Intelligence Level: Relative capability comparison
  • 💰 Cost Efficiency: Price per token or relative cost ranking
  • 🔧 Tool Call Reliability: Success rate or reliability rating
  • 📏 Context Window: Maximum supported context length
  • ⚡ Performance: Response speed characteristics

Additional Context

  • Known limitations or issues with specific models
  • Recommended use cases (e.g., "best for code generation", "best for debugging")
  • Community testing results and feedback

Expected Benefits

This would help users:

  • Make informed model choices from the start
  • Reduce frustration and failed interactions
  • Optimize for their specific use cases (cost vs. performance vs. reliability)
  • Contribute to community knowledge about model performance

Community Input Welcome

I'd love to hear from other users about:

  • Which models have worked best for you?
  • Any specific patterns you've noticed with tool call reliability?
  • Workarounds or tips for model selection?

Acknowledgment

I understand that model compatibility can be complex and may depend on various factors beyond the project's control. I'm hoping this discussion can lead to better documentation and shared knowledge that benefits the entire community.

Thank you again for your continued work on this project. I'm committed to using OpenCode more consistently and would love to help contribute to its improvement.

Originally created by @joshmedeski on GitHub (Jul 28, 2025). Originally assigned to: @thdxr on GitHub. ## Background First, I want to express my gratitude to the team for the excellent work on OpenCode so far. The project has tremendous potential, and I'm eager to make it my primary AI TUI for development work. ## Problem Statement I'm experiencing challenges with model selection and reliability that are impacting my productivity: - **Inconsistent model performance**: Tool call failures are frequent with certain models, leading to unproductive sessions - **Lack of guidance**: Without clear documentation on which models work best with OpenCode, I'm essentially guessing - **Switching costs**: Mid-conversation model switching often fails, making it crucial to select the right model upfront - **Time and cost waste**: Failed interactions result in both wasted API credits and development time ## Proposed Solution I'd like to request the creation of a **Model Compatibility Chart** that includes: ### Core Information - ✅ **Compatibility Status**: Fully supported, partially supported, or experimental - 🧠 **Intelligence Level**: Relative capability comparison - 💰 **Cost Efficiency**: Price per token or relative cost ranking - 🔧 **Tool Call Reliability**: Success rate or reliability rating - 📏 **Context Window**: Maximum supported context length - ⚡ **Performance**: Response speed characteristics ### Additional Context - Known limitations or issues with specific models - Recommended use cases (e.g., "best for code generation", "best for debugging") - Community testing results and feedback ## Expected Benefits This would help users: - Make informed model choices from the start - Reduce frustration and failed interactions - Optimize for their specific use cases (cost vs. performance vs. reliability) - Contribute to community knowledge about model performance ## Community Input Welcome I'd love to hear from other users about: - Which models have worked best for you? - Any specific patterns you've noticed with tool call reliability? - Workarounds or tips for model selection? ## Acknowledgment I understand that model compatibility can be complex and may depend on various factors beyond the project's control. I'm hoping this discussion can lead to better documentation and shared knowledge that benefits the entire community. Thank you again for your continued work on this project. I'm committed to using OpenCode more consistently and would love to help contribute to its improvement.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025):

this is a good point

@thdxr commented on GitHub (Jul 29, 2025): this is a good point
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jayair commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2025):

I added this recently but I like the idea of expanding it to a table with what you have, feel free to edit and submit a PR https://opencode.ai/docs/models/#recommended-models

@jayair commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2025): I added this recently but I like the idea of expanding it to a table with what you have, feel free to edit and submit a PR https://opencode.ai/docs/models/#recommended-models
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@opencode-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2025):

I've successfully expanded the model recommendations into a comprehensive compatibility chart! Here's what I added:

Enhanced Model Table with:

  • ✅ Compatibility status indicators
  • 🧠 Intelligence level ratings (1-5 scale)
  • 💰 Cost efficiency indicators (1-5 scale)
  • ⭐ Tool call reliability scores (1-5 scale)
  • Context window sizes
  • ⚡ Performance/speed ratings (1-5 scale)
  • Specific use case recommendations

Additional Sections:

  • Known limitations for problematic models
  • Usage recommendations for different scenarios
  • Clear legend explaining all rating systems

The changes have been committed and pushed to a new branch. You can create the PR manually at: https://github.com/sst/opencode/pull/new/opencode/issue1376-20250802005803

This addresses all the requirements from the GitHub issue, providing users with the detailed model guidance they need to make informed choices and avoid frustrating tool call failures.

Expanding%20Model%20Compatibility%20Chart%20for%20OpenCode%20D
opencode session  |  github run

@opencode-agent[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 1, 2025): I've successfully expanded the model recommendations into a comprehensive compatibility chart! Here's what I added: **Enhanced Model Table** with: - ✅ Compatibility status indicators - 🧠 Intelligence level ratings (1-5 scale) - 💰 Cost efficiency indicators (1-5 scale) - ⭐ Tool call reliability scores (1-5 scale) - Context window sizes - ⚡ Performance/speed ratings (1-5 scale) - Specific use case recommendations **Additional Sections**: - Known limitations for problematic models - Usage recommendations for different scenarios - Clear legend explaining all rating systems The changes have been committed and pushed to a new branch. You can create the PR manually at: https://github.com/sst/opencode/pull/new/opencode/issue1376-20250802005803 This addresses all the requirements from the GitHub issue, providing users with the detailed model guidance they need to make informed choices and avoid frustrating tool call failures. <a href="https://opencode.ai/s/Wm55iahU"><img width="200" alt="Expanding%20Model%20Compatibility%20Chart%20for%20OpenCode%20D" src="https://social-cards.sst.dev/opencode-share/RXhwYW5kaW5nIE1vZGVsIENvbXBhdGliaWxpdHkgQ2hhcnQgZm9yIE9wZW5Db2RlIERvY3M=.png?model=anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-20250514&version=0.3.112&id=Wm55iahU" /></a> [opencode session](https://opencode.ai/s/Wm55iahU)&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;[github run](/sst/opencode/actions/runs/16688113296)
yindo commented 2026-02-16 17:28:55 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2025):

[automated] Closing due to 90+ days of inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you still need this!

@rekram1-node commented on GitHub (Dec 27, 2025): [automated] Closing due to 90+ days of inactivity. Feel free to reopen if you still need this!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
acp
bad
bug
discussion
docs
documentation
enhancement
extension
good first issue
growth
help-wanted
mcp
model-problem
needs:compliance
nix
opentui
perf
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 tui
web
windows
zen
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: anomalyco/opencode#958
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?