mirror of
https://github.com/codewhale-hq/Codewhale.git
synced 2026-11-11 01:51:34 -10:00
fix(models): deepseek-flash in the offline catalog and the pinned expectations
CI on10aa19570failed three suites on the new DeepSeek default: the agent registry test (fixed by5ad9cdbbd), config::model_completion_scenario still pinned the pre-V4.1 list, and the subagent catalog-facade guard failed because the offline models_dev seed never gained the new id while OFFICIAL_DEEPSEEK_MODELS had. - models_dev.bundled.json: add the `deepseek-flash` row (V4.1 Flash, text-only, 1M/384K, reasoning, tool_call) and move the provider `default: true` flag to it, matching the file own default_rows invariant (default equals DEFAULT_DEEPSEEK_MODEL, which is deepseek-flash). - config/tests.rs: completion list expectation includes deepseek-flash. Evidence: - cargo test -p codewhale-tui --lib --locked -- config::tests::model_completion_scenario test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed - ... -- operator_model_for_subagent_enumerates_from_catalog_facade test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed (was FAILED: facade dropped deepseek-flash) - cargo test -p codewhale-config --locked -- models_dev test result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed - cargo test -p codewhale-tui --lib --locked -- provider_lake test result: ok. 34 passed; 0 failed
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
647fc7c5a3
commit
0d1c4d144c
2 files changed
+1858
-314
No files matched your search
File diff suppressed because it is too large.
Load diff
@@ -7494,6 +7494,7 @@ fn model_completion_scenario() {
|
||||
model_completion_names_for_provider(ApiProvider::Deepseek),
|
||||
vec![
|
||||
"deepseek-v4-pro",
|
||||
"deepseek-flash",
|
||||
"deepseek-v4-flash",
|
||||
"deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp"
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user