darling-gdb/binutils/MAINTAINERS

140 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
========= Binutils Maintainers =========
This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
shared amoungst the projects.
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
The home page for binutils is:
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
and patches should be sent to:
bug-binutils@gnu.org
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
top level configure.in and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
config-patches@gnu.org
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
and not to the binutils list.
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
The following people have permission to check patches into the
repository without obtaining approval first:
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Ian Taylor <ian@zembu.com>
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Michael Meissner <meissner@redhat.com>
--------- Maintainers ---------
Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
the immediate domain that they maintain.
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
responsibility among the other maintainers.
2002-08-06 21:58:26 +00:00
ALPHA Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
ARC Peter Targett <peter.targett@arc.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
AVR Denis Chertykov <denisc@overta.ru>
AVR Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@amelek.gda.pl>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
FR30 Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
FRV Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
2002-08-23 07:34:44 +00:00
HPPA elf64 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> [Basic maintainance only]
HPPA Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
IA64 Jim Wilson <wilson@redhat.com>
i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@redhat.com>
ix86 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
ix86 COFF,PE DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
ix86 H.J.Lu <hjl@gnu.org>
ix86 INTEL MODE Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <stcarrez@nerim.fr>
M68k Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
M88k Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>
MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@redhat.com>
2001-11-05 08:50:47 +00:00
s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
SH J<>rn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@superh.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
SH Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
SPARC Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>
2002-05-09 12:43:46 +00:00
VAX Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
2000-08-03 17:37:01 +00:00
CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
CGEN and the files that it creates.
2000-08-03 17:37:01 +00:00
If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
cgen@sources.redhat.com
2000-08-03 17:37:01 +00:00
The current CGEN maintainers are:
Doug Evans, Ben Elliston, Frank Eigler
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
--------- Write After Approval ---------
2000-07-05 19:28:06 +00:00
Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
2001-02-14 18:49:56 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
2001-02-14 18:49:56 +00:00
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
2001-07-11 09:06:49 +00:00
2001-07-19 10:43:13 +00:00
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
2001-07-11 09:06:49 +00:00
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>