mirror of
https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git
synced 2025-02-08 10:19:06 +00:00
Add GDB 5.0 release criteria.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney
parent
adde6300e0
commit
138f88c0ba
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
Mon Mar 27 19:53:29 2000 Andrew Cagney <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* TODO: Update. Add criteria for next release of GDB.
|
||||
|
||||
Mon Mar 27 17:20:25 2000 Andrew Cagney <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* acconfig.h: Provide default for HAVE_PTRACE_GETREGS.
|
||||
|
||||
326
gdb/TODO
326
gdb/TODO
@ -3,9 +3,333 @@ bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu. If you would like to work on any of these,
|
||||
you should consider sending mail to the same address, to find out
|
||||
whether anyone else is working on it.
|
||||
|
||||
General To Do List
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: GDB 5.0
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
Here are _all_ the issues that have been raised vis-a-vis the 5.0
|
||||
release. Also check the GDB, and other, mail archives
|
||||
(http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/).
|
||||
|
||||
If, however, you fix something, then feel free to tweek this file
|
||||
(deleting the problem). Just send a note to gdb-patches so that I see
|
||||
the change.
|
||||
|
||||
The names in paren are those that might know more about the problem.
|
||||
They don't necessarily indicate the people that will fix the problem.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Must have
|
||||
------------------
|
||||
|
||||
These are things that have been identifed as must-have for this
|
||||
release of GDB.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Watch point related patches (Eli Zaretskii, Michael Snyder, ???)
|
||||
|
||||
Eli writes: This doesn't include the watchpoint-related patches I sent
|
||||
beginning with August or September, and mentioned them again three
|
||||
weeks ago. Here again are the pointers to the relevant messages:
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00173.html
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q3/msg00204.html
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Hardware breakpoints and watchpoints: patches
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00200.html
|
||||
|
||||
Hardware watchpoints for bitfields
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q4/msg00201.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Tom's speedups to GDB (Tom Tromey, Jim Blandy)
|
||||
|
||||
I believe that there was a late breaking fix that stopped a coredump.
|
||||
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00869.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Solaris/x86 - which? (Nick Duffek, Peter Schauer, Michael Snyder?)
|
||||
|
||||
Nick D's working through patches from Michael Snyder and Peter S.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Texinfo broken/builds (Andrew Cagney, Stan Shebs)
|
||||
|
||||
Cagney probably botched a fix to a botch.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00803.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
RFA: breakpoint.c: Minor output fixes for hardware watchpoints
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00558.html
|
||||
|
||||
During implementation of hardware watchpoints on Solaris, I noticed the
|
||||
following inconsistencies in breakpoint.c output between software and
|
||||
hardware breakpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Nice to have
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
These are things that might make it in 5.0 but don't sit in the
|
||||
critical path. If they miss the 5.0 cut then they definitly should
|
||||
make the follow-on release.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Generic: lin-thread cannot handle thread exit (Mark Kettenis, Michael Snyder)
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00525.html
|
||||
|
||||
The thread_db assisted debugging code doesn't handle exiting threads
|
||||
properly, at least in combination with glibc 2.1.3 (the framework is
|
||||
there, just not the actual code). There are at least two problems
|
||||
that prevent this from working.
|
||||
|
||||
As an additional reference point, the pre thread_db code didn't work
|
||||
either.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Java (Anthony Green, David Taylor)
|
||||
|
||||
Anthony Green has started contributing late breaking Java patches:
|
||||
|
||||
Patch: java tests
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00512.html
|
||||
|
||||
Patch: java booleans
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00515.html
|
||||
|
||||
Patch: handle N_MAIN stab
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00527.html
|
||||
|
||||
It should be able to squeeze these in.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Pascal (Pierre Muller, David Taylor)
|
||||
|
||||
The pascal support patches nave been added to the patch data base. I
|
||||
[cagney] strongly suspect that they are better suited for 5.1.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Programs run under GDB have SIGCHLD masked.
|
||||
|
||||
[I think this can be worked around by using the action command -
|
||||
cagney]
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GNU/Linux/x86 and random thread signals (and Solaris/SPARC but not
|
||||
Solaris/x86)
|
||||
|
||||
Christopher Blizzard writes:
|
||||
|
||||
So, I've done some more digging into this and it looks like Jim
|
||||
Kingdon has reported this problem in the past:
|
||||
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/bug-gdb/1999-10/msg00058.html
|
||||
|
||||
I can reproduce this problem both with and without Tom's patch. Has
|
||||
anyone seen this before? Maybe have a solution for it hanging around?
|
||||
:)
|
||||
|
||||
There's a test case for this documented at:
|
||||
|
||||
when debugging threaded applications you get extra SIGTRAPs
|
||||
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9565
|
||||
|
||||
[There should be a GDB testcase - cagney]
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
IRIX?
|
||||
|
||||
Benjamin Gamsa wrote:
|
||||
|
||||
Has anyone successfully built the latest (from cvs) gdb on IRIX6.4 or
|
||||
later? The first problem I hit is that proc-api.c includes
|
||||
sys/user.h, which no longer exists under IRIX6.4. If I comment out
|
||||
that include, the next problem I hit is that PIOCGETPR and PIOCGETU
|
||||
are no longer defined in IRIX6.4 (presumably related to the
|
||||
disappearance of user.h).
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Regressions (prologue) with devel GCC.
|
||||
|
||||
The current head of the GCC branch doesn't co-operate well with GDB
|
||||
over debug information.
|
||||
|
||||
Regressions problem (200 failures)
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00475.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
RFA: infrun.c, breakpoint.c: Kludge for Solaris x86 hardware watchpoint support
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00664.html
|
||||
|
||||
Unfortunately I'd need the following kludge to work around a Solaris
|
||||
x86 kernel problem with hardware watchpoint support. See the comment
|
||||
in the patches for a description of the problem.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
RFD: infrun.c: No bpstat_stop_status call after proceed over break ?
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00665.html
|
||||
|
||||
I am currently trying to fix a GDB bug with missing watchpoint triggers
|
||||
after proceeding over a breakpoint on x86 targets.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Won't have
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The following are on hold until GDB 5.0 is branched. In general they
|
||||
won't go in as they unsettle the GDB sources.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED
|
||||
|
||||
The need for this as almost been eliminated. The next version of GCC
|
||||
(assuming cagney gets the revised patch approved) will be able to
|
||||
supress unused parameter warnings.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Delete macro TARGET_BYTE_ORDER_SELECTABLE.
|
||||
|
||||
Patches in the database.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Updated readline
|
||||
|
||||
Readline 4.? is out. A merge wouldn't hurt.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Purge PARAMS
|
||||
|
||||
Something to do post 5.0 branch
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Test results
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Please include:
|
||||
|
||||
o the output of `config.guess`
|
||||
o the date
|
||||
o the compiler
|
||||
o a note mentioning the reason
|
||||
for any serious failures.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
alpha-dec-osf4.0a, vendor compiler, 2000-03-04
|
||||
|
||||
Still has many compile warnings (mostly relating back to PTR vs void*)
|
||||
but it did compile using:
|
||||
|
||||
CC=cc .../configure
|
||||
make
|
||||
|
||||
Test results are:
|
||||
|
||||
# of expected passes 6223
|
||||
# of unexpected failures 103
|
||||
# of unexpected successes 2
|
||||
# of expected failures 196
|
||||
# of unresolved testcases 6
|
||||
# of unsupported tests 1
|
||||
|
||||
Looking at the output it would appear that GDB is stepping into some
|
||||
functions instead of ``next'' ing over them:
|
||||
|
||||
35 dummy();
|
||||
(gdb) next
|
||||
dummy () at /home/cagney/GDB-DEJAGNU/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/all-types.c:41
|
||||
41 {
|
||||
|
||||
Since there is no active maintainer, I'd consider this sufficient for
|
||||
5.0 :-/
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
sparc-sun-solaris2.6, egcs-2.91.66, 2000-02-10
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-testers/2000-q1/msg00030.html
|
||||
|
||||
There is a SIGTRAP problem that occures in ptrace.exp (Cagney to
|
||||
expand on).
|
||||
|
||||
# of expected passes 6420
|
||||
# of unexpected failures 7
|
||||
# of expected failures 199
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
solaris 2.5.1 sparc?, 2.9-gnupro-99r1, 2000-02-10
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-testers/2000-q1/msg00032.html
|
||||
|
||||
# of expected passes 6420
|
||||
# of unexpected failures 6
|
||||
# of expected failures 199
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
sparc-unknown-netbsdelf1.4P, egcs-1.1.2+, 2000-03-01
|
||||
|
||||
This is with a very recent kernel.
|
||||
|
||||
# of expected passes 6055
|
||||
# of unexpected failures 88
|
||||
# of unexpected successes 1
|
||||
# of expected failures 190
|
||||
# of unresolved testcases 59
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GNU/Linux PPC
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00185.html
|
||||
|
||||
Kevins merged it all in.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Unixware
|
||||
|
||||
Builds ok. Problems with some of the thread code. Unfortunate but
|
||||
not a show stopper. Nick D's still looking at it.
|
||||
|
||||
Re: uw-threads issues
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00025.html
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
General Wish List
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
This list is probably not up to date, and opinions vary about the
|
||||
importance or even desirability of some of the items.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user