darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2024-11-26 13:30:30 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2002-02-08 Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com>

Browse Source 
* gas/mips/mips.exp: Document (but do not XFAIL) currently-failing
        MIPS ECOFF tests, providing what information is known about
        the origins of the failures.
This commit is contained in:
Chris Demetriou 2002-02-09 07:18:54 +00:00
parent 74c44237fd
commit 51124b6cb9
2 changed files with 30 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2002-02-08 Chris Demetriou <cgd@broadcom.com>
* gas/mips/mips.exp: Document (but do not XFAIL) currently-failing
MIPS ECOFF tests, providing what information is known about
the origins of the failures.
2002-02-08 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Contribute sh64-elf.

24
gas/testsuite/gas/mips/mips.exp
View File

@ -2,6 +2,12 @@
# Some generic MIPS tests
#
# "LOSE" marks information about tests which fail at a particular point
# in time, but which are not XFAILed. Either they used to pass
# and indicate either regressions or the need to tweak the tests to keep
# up the with code, or they are new tests and it is unknown whether or not
# they should pass as-is for the given object formats.
proc run_list_test { name opts } {
global srcdir subdir
set testname "MIPS $name"
@ -40,11 +46,17 @@ if { [istarget mips*-*-*] } then {
run_dump_test "and"
run_dump_test "break20"
run_dump_test "trap20"
# LOSE: As of 2002-02-08, "beq" through "bltu" fail for target mips-ecoff.
# See http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-10/msg00418.html for
# more information. Not sure if the fixes there are correct; should
# branches to external labels be allowed for ECOFF?
run_dump_test "beq"
run_dump_test "bge"
run_dump_test "bgeu"
run_dump_test "blt"
run_dump_test "bltu"
if !$ilocks { run_dump_test "div" } else { run_dump_test "div-ilocks" }
run_dump_test "dli"
if $elf {
@ -54,10 +66,16 @@ if { [istarget mips*-*-*] } then {
}
if $elf { run_dump_test "jal-svr4pic" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "jal-xgot" }
# LOSE: As of 2002-02-08, the jal-empic test fails for target mips-ecoff.
# It appears that it broke between 2000-03-11 00:00UTC and
# 2000-03-12 00:00 UTC.
if $ecoff { run_dump_test "jal-empic" }
if !$aout { run_dump_test "la" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "la-svr4pic" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "la-xgot" }
# LOSE: As of 2002-02-08, the la-empic test fails for target mips-ecoff.
# Not sure when it first cropped up, but may be related to addition of
# "la" -> "addiu" pattern in MIPS opcode table long ago.
if $ecoff { run_dump_test "la-empic" }
if !$aout { run_dump_test "lb" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "lb-svr4pic" }
@ -86,6 +104,9 @@ if { [istarget mips*-*-*] } then {
if !$aout { run_dump_test "lifloat" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "lif-svr4pic" }
if $elf { run_dump_test "lif-xgot" }
# LOSE: As of 2002-02-08, the lif-empic test fails for target mips-ecoff.
# It appears that it broke between 2000-03-11 00:00UTC and
# 2000-03-12 00:00 UTC.
if $ecoff { run_dump_test "lif-empic" }
run_dump_test "mips4"
if !$ilocks { run_dump_test "mul" } else { run_dump_test "mul-ilocks" }
@ -126,6 +147,9 @@ if { [istarget mips*-*-*] } then {
run_list_test "illegal" ""
# LOSE: As of 2002-02-08, the next 4 tests fail for target mips-ecoff.
# It's unknown whether they _should_ pass as-is, or whether different
# variants are needed for ELF and ECOFF.
run_dump_test "mips-gp32-fp32"
run_dump_test "mips-gp32-fp64"
run_dump_test "mips-gp64-fp32"