darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2025-02-28 13:26:30 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2003-07-07 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>

Browse Source 
* frame.c (get_prev_frame): Enable check for identical frames.
	Update comments.  Update error messages.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney 2003-07-07 20:07:12 +00:00
parent 492c11d3be
commit 612dde91c1
2 changed files with 14 additions and 13 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2003-07-07 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* frame.c (get_prev_frame): Enable check for identical frames.
Update comments. Update error messages.
2003-07-07 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
* hpread.c (hpread_psymtab_to_symtab_1): Fix compilation failure.

22
gdb/frame.c
View File

@ -1906,25 +1906,21 @@ get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *this_frame)
}
/* Check that this frame's ID isn't inner to (younger, below, next)
the next frame. This happens when frame unwind goes backwards.
Since the sentinel frame isn't valid, don't apply this if this
frame is entier the inner-most or sentinel frame. */
the next frame. This happens when a frame unwind goes backwards.
Since the sentinel frame doesn't really exist, don't compare the
inner-most against that sentinel. */
if (this_frame->level > 0
&& frame_id_inner (get_frame_id (this_frame),
get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
error ("This frame inner-to next frame (corrupt stack?)");
error ("Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
/* Check that this and the next frame are different. If they are
not, there is most likely a stack cycle. As with the inner-than
test, avoid the inner-most and sentinel frames. */
/* FIXME: cagney/2003-03-17: Can't yet enable this this check. The
frame_id_eq() method doesn't yet use function addresses when
comparing frame IDs. */
if (0
&& this_frame->level > 0
/* Check that this and the next frame are not identical. If they
are, there is most likely a stack cycle. As with the inner-than
test above, avoid comparing the inner-most and sentinel frames. */
if (this_frame->level > 0
&& frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (this_frame),
get_frame_id (this_frame->next)))
error ("This frame identical to next frame (corrupt stack?)");
error ("Previous frame identical to this frame (corrupt stack?)");
/* Allocate the new frame but do not wire it in to the frame chain.
Some (bad) code in INIT_FRAME_EXTRA_INFO tries to look along