darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2024-12-01 16:35:04 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

punctuation fixes

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Jim Kingdon 1993-05-26 05:24:25 +00:00
parent 43795ece80
commit 8abe819439
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/doc/stabs.texinfo
View File

@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ Descriptors,,Table D: Type Descriptors}, for a list of
There is an AIX extension for type attributes. Following the @samp{=}
is any number of type attributes. Each one starts with @samp{@@} and
ends with @samp{;}. Debuggers, including AIX's dbx, skip any type
attributes they do not recognize. GDB 4.9 does not do this--it will
attributes they do not recognize. GDB 4.9 does not do this---it will
ignore the entire symbol containing a type attribute. Hopefully this
will be fixed in the next GDB release. Because of a conflict with C++
(@pxref{Cplusplus}), new attributes should not be defined which begin
@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ number of the register where the variable data will be stored.
The value is the register number.
AIX defines a separate symbol descriptor @samp{d} for floating point
registers. This seems incredibly stupid--why not just just give
registers. This seems incredibly stupid---why not just just give
floating point registers different register numbers? I have not
verified whether the compiler actually uses @samp{d}.