darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2025-02-08 10:19:06 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>

Browse Source 
* frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Revert change below, use
	PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY.
	(get_prev_frame): Ditto.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney 2002-11-24 15:41:59 +00:00
parent 5e0f933e90
commit 931d12c681
2 changed files with 21 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* frame.c (set_unwind_by_pc): Revert change below, use
PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY.
(get_prev_frame): Ditto.
2002-11-24 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
* dummy-frame.c (pc_in_dummy_frame): New function.

19
gdb/frame.c
View File

@ -656,7 +656,11 @@ set_unwind_by_pc (CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR fp,
*unwind_register = frame_saved_regs_register_unwind;
*unwind_pc = frame_saved_regs_pc_unwind;
}
else if (pc_in_dummy_frame (pc))
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-24: Can't yet directly call
pc_in_dummy_frame() as some architectures don't set
PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY() to generic_pc_in_call_dummy() (remember the
latter is implemented by simply calling pc_in_dummy_frame). */
else if (PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (pc, 0, 0))
{
*unwind_register = dummy_frame_register_unwind;
*unwind_pc = dummy_frame_pc_unwind;
@ -694,7 +698,11 @@ create_new_frame (CORE_ADDR addr, CORE_ADDR pc)
has previously set it. This is really somewhat bogus. The
initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur
before the INIT function has been called. */
if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && pc_in_dummy_frame (pc))
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-24: Can't yet directly call
pc_in_dummy_frame() as some architectures don't set
PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY() to generic_pc_in_call_dummy() (remember the
latter is implemented by simply calling pc_in_dummy_frame). */
if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (pc, 0, 0))
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-11-11: Does this even occure? */
type = DUMMY_FRAME;
else
@ -975,8 +983,11 @@ get_prev_frame (struct frame_info *next_frame)
has previously set it. This is really somewhat bogus. The
initialization, as seen in create_new_frame(), should occur
before the INIT function has been called. */
if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES
&& pc_in_dummy_frame (prev->pc))
/* FIXME: cagney/2002-11-24: Can't yet directly call
pc_in_dummy_frame() as some architectures don't set
PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY() to generic_pc_in_call_dummy() (remember the
latter is implemented by simply calling pc_in_dummy_frame). */
if (USE_GENERIC_DUMMY_FRAMES && PC_IN_CALL_DUMMY (prev->pc, 0, 0))
prev->type = DUMMY_FRAME;
else
{