darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2024-11-29 15:00:34 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix a segfault caused by under-allocating an array.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Alan Modra 2000-09-21 10:13:18 +00:00
parent 82efde3a56
commit a017a7241d
2 changed files with 24 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
bfd/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
2000-09-21 Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
* elf32-hppa.c (elf32_hppa_check_relocs): Fix weak sym handling in
currently unused RELATIVE_DYNAMIC_RELOCS code.
(hppa_discard_copies): Likewise.
(elf32_hppa_size_stubs): Size `input_list' array correctly.
2000-09-20 Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>
* section.c (bfd_get_unique_section_name): Return NULL if

35
bfd/elf32-hppa.c
View File

@ -1537,8 +1537,7 @@ elf32_hppa_check_relocs (abfd, info, sec, relocs)
|| is_absolute_reloc (r_type)
|| (h != NULL
&& ((h->elf.elf_link_hash_flags
& ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0
|| h->elf.root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak)))
& ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) == 0)))
#endif
)
{
@ -2096,7 +2095,7 @@ hppa_discard_copies (h, inf)
any relocs. */
if (eh->elf.dynindx == -1
|| ((eh->elf.elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_REGULAR) != 0
&& eh->elf.root.type != bfd_link_hash_defweak
&& !is_absolute_reloc (r_type)
&& info->symbolic))
{
for (s = eh->reloc_entries; s != NULL; s = s->next)
@ -2441,8 +2440,15 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
hplink->add_stub_section = add_stub_section;
hplink->layout_sections_again = layout_sections_again;
/* Count the number of input BFDs and find the top section id. */
for (input_bfd = info->input_bfds, bfd_count = 0, top_id = 0;
/* Count the number of input BFDs, find the top input section id,
and the top output section index. We can't use output_bfd
section_count here to find the top output section index as some
sections may have been removed, and _bfd_strip_section_from_output
doesn't renumber the indices. Also, sections created by the
linker aren't counted, and to make matters worse, aren't even on
the output_bfd section list. We could probably just ignore
sections created by the linker, but this way seems safer. */
for (input_bfd = info->input_bfds, bfd_count = 0, top_id = 0, top_index = 0;
input_bfd != NULL;
input_bfd = input_bfd->link_next)
{
@ -2453,6 +2459,10 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
{
if (top_id < section->id)
top_id = section->id;
if (section->output_section != NULL
&& section->output_section->owner == output_bfd
&& top_index < section->output_section->index)
top_index = section->output_section->index;
}
}
@ -2461,18 +2471,7 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
if (hplink->stub_group == NULL)
return false;
/* Now make a list of input sections for each output section.
We can't use output_bfd->section_count here as some sections may
have been removed, and _bfd_strip_section_from_output doesn't
renumber the indices. Sections may also be re-ordered, so the
last section index isn't necessarily the biggest. */
for (section = output_bfd->sections, top_index = 0;
section != NULL;
section = section->next)
{
if (top_index < section->index)
top_index = section->index;
}
/* Now make a list of input sections for each output section. */
input_list
= (asection **) bfd_zmalloc (sizeof (asection *) * (top_index + 1));
if (input_list == NULL)
@ -2506,7 +2505,7 @@ elf32_hppa_size_stubs (output_bfd, stub_bfd, info, multi_subspace,
.fini output sections respectively, because glibc splits the
_init and _fini functions into multiple parts. Putting a stub in
the middle of a function is not a good idea. */
list = input_list + output_bfd->section_count;
list = input_list + top_index;
while (list-- != input_list)
{
asection *tail = *list;