* gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_branch2,do_media): New.

* gas/hppa/basic/branch2.s:  New.
        * gas/hppa/basic/media.s:  New.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Law 1999-08-28 06:44:31 +00:00
parent a97685e901
commit be3f1865fb
4 changed files with 156 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
Sat Aug 28 00:16:12 1999 Jerry Quinn <jquinn@nortelnetworks.com>
* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_fp_comp2): New.
* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s: New.
* gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_branch2,do_media): New.
* gas/hppa/basic/branch2.s: New.
* gas/hppa/basic/media.s: New.
* gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_fp_comp2): New.
* gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s: New.
1999-08-20 Alan Modra <alan@spri.levels.unisa.edu.au>

View File

@ -359,6 +359,52 @@ proc do_branch {} {
if [expr $x==183] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_branch2 {} {
set testname "branch2.s: branch tests"
set x 0
gas_start "branch2.s" "-al"
# Check the assembled instruction against a table built by the HP assembler
# Any differences should be checked by hand -- with the number of problems
# I've seen in the HP assembler I don't completely trust it.
#
# Instead of having a variable for each match string just increment the
# total number of matches seen. That's simpler when testing large numbers
# of instructions (as these tests to).
while 1 {
expect {
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0000 C0045FF5\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0004 C004DFED\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0008 C0045FE7\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 000c C004DFDF\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0010 C0047FD5\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0014 C004FFCD\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0018 C0047FC7\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 001c C004FFBF\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0020 C4A47FB5\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0024 C4A4FFAD\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0028 C4A47FA7\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 002c C4A4FF9F\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0030 E8004005\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0034 E800400D\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0038 E8004F9D\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 003c E8004001\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0040 E8044001\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
timeout { perror "timeout\n"; break }
eof { break }
}
}
# This was intended to do any cleanup necessary. It kinda looks like it
# isn't needed, but just in case, please keep it in for now.
gas_finish
# Did we find what we were looking for? If not, flunk it.
if [expr $x==17] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_add {} {
set testname "add.s: add tests"
set x 0
@ -2025,6 +2071,42 @@ proc do_fp_fcmp {} {
if [expr $x==96] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_media {} {
set testname "media.s: purge tests"
set x 0
gas_start "media.s" "-al"
# Check the assembled instruction against a table built by the HP assembler
# Any differences should be checked by hand -- with the number of problems
# I've seen in the HP assembler I don't completely trust it.
#
# Instead of having a variable for each match string just increment the
# total number of matches seen. That's simpler when testing large numbers
# of instructions (as these tests to).
while 1 {
expect {
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0000 096702CC\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0004 0967074C\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0008 0967078C\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 000c 096707CC\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0010 0967054C\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0014 0967058C\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0014 096705CC\[^\n]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
timeout { perror "timeout\n"; break }
eof { break }
}
}
# This was intended to do any cleanup necessary. It kinda looks like it
# isn't needed, but just in case, please keep it in for now.
gas_finish
# Did we find what we were looking for? If not, flunk it.
if [expr $x==18] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_special {} {
set testname "special.s: special tests"
set x 0
@ -2309,4 +2391,6 @@ if [istarget hppa*-*-*] then {
# PA2.0 tests
do_fp_comp2
do_branch2
do_media
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
.LEVEL 2.0
.SPACE $PRIVATE$
.SUBSPA $DATA$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31
.SUBSPA $BSS$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31,ZERO,SORT=82
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $LIT$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44
.SUBSPA $CODE$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44,CODE_ONLY
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $CODE$
.align 4
; More branching instructions than you ever knew what to do with.
; PA 2.0 versions and new syntax.
;
; We could/should test some of the corner cases for register and
; immediate fields. We should also check the assorted field
; selectors to make sure they're handled correctly.
bb_tests:
bb,< %r4,%sar,bb_tests
bb,>= %r4,%sar,bb_tests
bb,<,n %r4,%cr11,bb_tests
bb,>=,n %r4,%cr11,bb_tests
bb,*< %r4,%sar,bb_tests
bb,*>= %r4,%sar,bb_tests
bb,*<,n %r4,%cr11,bb_tests
bb,*>=,n %r4,%cr11,bb_tests
bb,*< %r4,5,bb_tests
bb,*>= %r4,5,bb_tests
bb,*<,n %r4,5,bb_tests
bb,*>=,n %r4,5,bb_tests
branch_stack:
clrbts
popbts 1
popbts 499
pushnom
pushbts %r4

View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
.LEVEL 2.0
.SPACE $PRIVATE$
.SUBSPA $DATA$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31
.SUBSPA $BSS$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31,ZERO,SORT=82
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $LIT$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44
.SUBSPA $CODE$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44,CODE_ONLY
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $CODE$
.align 4
; PA2.0 multimedia (halfword) instruction tests
;
; We could/should test some of the corner cases for register and
; immediate fields. We should also check the assorted field
; selectors to make sure they're handled correctly.
havg %r7,%r11,%r12
hshladd %r7,1,%r11,%r12
hshladd %r7,2,%r11,%r12
hshladd %r7,3,%r11,%r12
hshradd %r7,1,%r11,%r12
hshradd %r7,2,%r11,%r12
hshradd %r7,3,%r11,%r12