darlinghq/darling-gdb
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git synced 2024-11-24 12:39:59 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

From 2000-03-27 Peter Schauer <pes@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>:

Browse Source 
* procfs.c (init_procfs_ops):  Set procfs_ops.to_has_memory and
procfs_ops.to_has_all_memory to 1.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney 2000-04-07 04:33:21 +00:00
parent 279b54a119
commit d311cd50fc
3 changed files with 10 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
Fri Apr 7 13:33:43 2000 Andrew Cagney <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
From 2000-03-27 Peter Schauer <pes@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de>:
* procfs.c (init_procfs_ops): Set procfs_ops.to_has_memory and
procfs_ops.to_has_all_memory to 1.
* TODO: Update
2000-04-06 Nick Duffek <nsd@cygnus.com>
* configure.in (_MSE_INT_H): Define on Solaris 7.

18
gdb/TODO
View File

@ -28,24 +28,6 @@ release of GDB.
--
Solaris/x86 - which? (Nick Duffek, Peter Schauer, Michael Snyder?)
Nick D's working through patches from Michael Snyder and Peter S.
--
RFA: procfs.c: init_procfs_ops should set
procfs_ops.to_has_[all]_memory (Peter Schauer, Andrew Cagney?)
I am pretty sure that this is caused by some accidental deletion, but
procfs.c:init_procfs_ops no longer sets procfs_ops.to_has_memory and
procfs_ops.to_has_all_memory.
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg01057.html
--
GDB 5.0: Nice to have
---------------------

2
gdb/procfs.c
View File

@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ init_procfs_ops ()
procfs_ops.to_thread_alive = procfs_thread_alive;
procfs_ops.to_pid_to_str = procfs_pid_to_str;
procfs_ops.to_has_all_memory = 1;
procfs_ops.to_has_memory = 1;
procfs_ops.to_has_execution = 1;
procfs_ops.to_has_stack = 1;
procfs_ops.to_has_registers = 1;