mirror of
https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-gdb.git
synced 2024-11-30 23:40:24 +00:00
testsuite: Fix recent GCC FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp
gcc-6.2.1-2.fc24.x86_64 (gdb) backtrace 10^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp: backtrace 10 (gdb) disas/s Dump of assembler code for function main: .../gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-signal.c: 30 { 0x000000000040057f <+0>: push %rbp 0x0000000000400580 <+1>: mov %rsp,%rbp 31 setup (); 0x0000000000400583 <+4>: callq 0x400590 <setup> => 0x0000000000400588 <+9>: mov $0x0,%eax 32 } 0x000000000040058d <+14>: pop %rbp 0x000000000040058e <+15>: retq End of assembler dump. The .exp patch is an obvious typo fix I think. The regex was written to accept "ADDR in main" and I find it OK as checking .debug_line validity is not the purpose of this testfile. gcc-4.8.5-11.el7.x86_64 did not put the 'mov $0x0,%eax' instruction there at all so there was no problem with .debug_line. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2016-10-05 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> * gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp (backtrace 10): Fix #2 typo.
This commit is contained in:
parent
39b5a3b9b3
commit
f389f6fef7
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
2016-10-05 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdb.arch/i386-signal.exp (backtrace 10): Fix #2 typo.
|
||||
|
||||
2016-10-05 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
|
||||
|
||||
* lib/gdb.exp (support_complex_tests): Return zero if
|
||||
|
@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ gdb_load ${binfile}
|
||||
|
||||
runto func
|
||||
gdb_test "backtrace 10" \
|
||||
"#0 ($hex in )?func.*\r\n#1 <signal handler called>\r\n#2 ($hex in)?main.*"
|
||||
"#0 ($hex in )?func.*\r\n#1 <signal handler called>\r\n#2 ($hex in )?main.*"
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit from \#0 func.*<signal handler called>"
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user