unordered: Rename __construct_node_hash() to allow forwarding, NFC

Rename the version of __construct_node() that takes a hash as an
argument to __construct_node_hash(), and use perfect-forwarding when
Rvalue references are available.  The primary motivation is to allow
other types through, since unordered_map's value_type is different from
__hash_table's value_type -- a follow-up will take advantage of this --
but the rename is general "goodness".

There should be no functionality change here (aside from enabling the
follow-up).

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@258511 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 2016-01-22 18:27:26 +00:00
parent 219d4efd34
commit 9572235332

View File

@ -1047,11 +1047,12 @@ private:
template <class ..._Args>
__node_holder __construct_node(_Args&& ...__args);
#endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
__node_holder __construct_node(value_type&& __v, size_t __hash);
template <class _ValueTp>
__node_holder __construct_node_hash(_ValueTp&& __v, size_t __hash);
#else // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES
__node_holder __construct_node(const value_type& __v);
#endif
__node_holder __construct_node(const value_type& __v, size_t __hash);
__node_holder __construct_node_hash(const value_type& __v, size_t __hash);
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY
void __copy_assign_alloc(const __hash_table& __u)
@ -1730,7 +1731,7 @@ __hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__insert_unique_value(const value_type
}
}
{
__node_holder __h = __construct_node(_VSTD::forward<_ValueTp>(__x), __hash);
__node_holder __h = __construct_node_hash(_VSTD::forward<_ValueTp>(__x), __hash);
if (size()+1 > __bc * max_load_factor() || __bc == 0)
{
rehash(_VSTD::max<size_type>(2 * __bc + !__is_hash_power2(__bc),
@ -2051,13 +2052,14 @@ __hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node(_Args&& ...__args)
#endif // _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
template <class _Tp, class _Hash, class _Equal, class _Alloc>
template <class _ValueTp>
typename __hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__node_holder
__hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node(value_type&& __v,
size_t __hash)
__hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node_hash(_ValueTp&& __v,
size_t __hash)
{
__node_allocator& __na = __node_alloc();
__node_holder __h(__node_traits::allocate(__na, 1), _Dp(__na));
__node_traits::construct(__na, _VSTD::addressof(__h->__value_), _VSTD::move(__v));
__node_traits::construct(__na, _VSTD::addressof(__h->__value_), _VSTD::forward<_ValueTp>(__v));
__h.get_deleter().__value_constructed = true;
__h->__hash_ = __hash;
__h->__next_ = nullptr;
@ -2083,8 +2085,8 @@ __hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node(const value_type& __v
template <class _Tp, class _Hash, class _Equal, class _Alloc>
typename __hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__node_holder
__hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node(const value_type& __v,
size_t __hash)
__hash_table<_Tp, _Hash, _Equal, _Alloc>::__construct_node_hash(const value_type& __v,
size_t __hash)
{
__node_allocator& __na = __node_alloc();
__node_holder __h(__node_traits::allocate(__na, 1), _Dp(__na));