mirror of
https://github.com/darlinghq/darling-libcxx.git
synced 2024-11-23 11:59:52 +00:00
Swap two lines in __mutex_base. On systems with high clock rates, we could mistakenly return no_timeout when a mutex had timed out if we got a tick between these two lines. Thanks to Brian Cain for the bug report.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk@291492 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
8fe92cc0c9
commit
f3e7677540
@ -410,8 +410,8 @@ condition_variable::wait_for(unique_lock<mutex>& __lk,
|
||||
typedef time_point<system_clock, duration<long double, nano> > __sys_tpf;
|
||||
typedef time_point<system_clock, nanoseconds> __sys_tpi;
|
||||
__sys_tpf _Max = __sys_tpi::max();
|
||||
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
|
||||
steady_clock::time_point __c_now = steady_clock::now();
|
||||
system_clock::time_point __s_now = system_clock::now();
|
||||
if (_Max - __d > __s_now)
|
||||
__do_timed_wait(__lk, __s_now + __ceil<nanoseconds>(__d));
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user