darling-libobjc2/spinlock.h

81 lines
2.6 KiB
C

#ifdef __MINGW32__
#include <windows.h>
static unsigned sleep(unsigned seconds)
{
Sleep(seconds*1000);
return 0;
}
#else
#include <unistd.h>
#endif
/**
* Number of spinlocks. This allocates one page on 32-bit platforms.
*/
#define spinlock_count (1<<10)
static const int spinlock_mask = spinlock_count - 1;
/**
* Integers used as spinlocks for atomic property access.
*/
extern int spinlocks[spinlock_count];
/**
* Get a spin lock from a pointer. We want to prevent lock contention between
* properties in the same object - if someone is stupid enough to be using
* atomic property access, they are probably stupid enough to do it for
* multiple properties in the same object. We also want to try to avoid
* contention between the same property in different objects, so we can't just
* use the ivar offset.
*/
static inline int *lock_for_pointer(void *ptr)
{
intptr_t hash = (intptr_t)ptr;
// Most properties will be pointers, so disregard the lowest few bits
hash >>= sizeof(void*) == 4 ? 2 : 8;
intptr_t low = hash & spinlock_mask;
hash >>= 16;
hash |= low;
return spinlocks + (hash & spinlock_mask);
}
/**
* Unlocks the spinlock. This is not an atomic operation. We are only ever
* modifying the lowest bit of the spinlock word, so it doesn't matter if this
* is two writes because there is no contention among the high bit. There is
* no possibility of contention among calls to this, because it may only be
* called by the thread owning the spin lock.
*/
inline static void unlock_spinlock(int *spinlock)
{
*spinlock = 0;
}
/**
* Attempts to lock a spinlock. This is heavily optimised for the uncontended
* case, because property access should (generally) not be contended. In the
* uncontended case, this is a single atomic compare and swap instruction and a
* branch. Atomic CAS is relatively expensive (can be a pipeline flush, and
* may require locking a cache line in a cache-coherent SMP system, but it's a
* lot cheaper than a system call).
*
* If the lock is contended, then we just sleep and then try again after the
* other threads have run. Note that there is no upper bound on the potential
* running time of this function, which is one of the great many reasons that
* using atomic accessors is a terrible idea, but in the common case it should
* be very fast.
*/
inline static void lock_spinlock(int *spinlock)
{
int count = 0;
// Set the spin lock value to 1 if it is 0.
while(!__sync_bool_compare_and_swap(spinlock, 0, 1))
{
count++;
if (0 == count % 10)
{
// If it is already 1, let another thread play with the CPU for a
// bit then try again.
sleep(0);
}
}
}