mirror of
https://github.com/joel16/android_kernel_sony_msm8994.git
synced 2024-11-27 06:01:12 +00:00
futex: restartable futex_wait
LTP test sigaction_16_24 fails, because it expects sem_wait to be restarted if SA_RESTART is set. sem_wait is implemented with futex_wait, that currently doesn't support being restarted. Ulrich confirms that the call should be restartable. Implement a restart_block method to handle the relative timeout, and allow restarts. Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9adef58b1d
commit
72c1bbf308
@ -980,12 +980,15 @@ static void unqueue_me_pi(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
|
||||
drop_futex_key_refs(&q->key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned long time)
|
||||
static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart);
|
||||
static int futex_wait_abstime(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val,
|
||||
int timed, unsigned long abs_time)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *curr = current;
|
||||
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, curr);
|
||||
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
|
||||
struct futex_q q;
|
||||
unsigned long time_left = 0;
|
||||
u32 uval;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1065,8 +1068,21 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned long time)
|
||||
* !list_empty() is safe here without any lock.
|
||||
* q.lock_ptr != 0 is not safe, because of ordering against wakeup.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (likely(!list_empty(&q.list)))
|
||||
time = schedule_timeout(time);
|
||||
time_left = 0;
|
||||
if (likely(!list_empty(&q.list))) {
|
||||
unsigned long rel_time;
|
||||
|
||||
if (timed) {
|
||||
unsigned long now = jiffies;
|
||||
if (time_after(now, abs_time))
|
||||
rel_time = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
rel_time = abs_time - now;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
rel_time = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
|
||||
|
||||
time_left = schedule_timeout(rel_time);
|
||||
}
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1077,13 +1093,25 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned long time)
|
||||
/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
|
||||
if (!unqueue_me(&q))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (time == 0)
|
||||
if (time_left == 0)
|
||||
return -ETIMEDOUT;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We expect signal_pending(current), but another thread may
|
||||
* have handled it for us already.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return -EINTR;
|
||||
if (time_left == MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT)
|
||||
return -ERESTARTSYS;
|
||||
else {
|
||||
struct restart_block *restart;
|
||||
restart = ¤t_thread_info()->restart_block;
|
||||
restart->fn = futex_wait_restart;
|
||||
restart->arg0 = (unsigned long)uaddr;
|
||||
restart->arg1 = (unsigned long)val;
|
||||
restart->arg2 = (unsigned long)timed;
|
||||
restart->arg3 = abs_time;
|
||||
return -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out_unlock_release_sem:
|
||||
queue_unlock(&q, hb);
|
||||
@ -1093,6 +1121,24 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned long time)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 val, unsigned long rel_time)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int timed = (rel_time != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
|
||||
return futex_wait_abstime(uaddr, val, timed, jiffies+rel_time);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static long futex_wait_restart(struct restart_block *restart)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 __user *uaddr = (u32 __user *)restart->arg0;
|
||||
u32 val = (u32)restart->arg1;
|
||||
int timed = (int)restart->arg2;
|
||||
unsigned long abs_time = restart->arg3;
|
||||
|
||||
restart->fn = do_no_restart_syscall;
|
||||
return (long)futex_wait_abstime(uaddr, val, timed, abs_time);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Userspace tried a 0 -> TID atomic transition of the futex value
|
||||
* and failed. The kernel side here does the whole locking operation:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user