mirror of
https://github.com/joel16/android_kernel_sony_msm8994.git
synced 2024-12-04 18:47:20 +00:00
softirq,rcu: Inform RCU of irq_exit() activity
The rcu_read_unlock_special() function relies on in_irq() to exclude scheduler activity from interrupt level. This fails because exit_irq() can invoke the scheduler after clearing the preempt_count() bits that in_irq() uses to determine that it is at interrupt level. This situation can result in failures as follows: $task IRQ SoftIRQ rcu_read_lock() /* do stuff */ <preempt> |= UNLOCK_BLOCKED rcu_read_unlock() --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting irq_enter(); /* do stuff, don't use RCU */ irq_exit(); sub_preempt_count(IRQ_EXIT_OFFSET); invoke_softirq() ttwu(); spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock) rcu_read_lock(); /* do stuff */ rcu_read_unlock(); rcu_read_unlock_special() rcu_report_exp_rnp() ttwu() spin_lock_irq(&pi->lock) /* deadlock */ rcu_read_unlock_special(t); Ed can simply trigger this 'easy' because invoke_softirq() immediately does a ttwu() of ksoftirqd/# instead of doing the in-place softirq stuff first, but even without that the above happens. Cure this by also excluding softirqs from the rcu_read_unlock_special() handler and ensuring the force_irqthreads ksoftirqd/# wakeup is done from full softirq context. [ Alternatively, delaying the ->rcu_read_lock_nesting decrement until after the special handling would make the thing more robust in the face of interrupts as well. And there is a separate patch for that. ] Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-and-tested-by: Ed Tomlinson <edt@aei.ca> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c5d753a55a
commit
ec433f0c51
@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hardware IRQ handlers cannot block. */
|
||||
if (in_irq()) {
|
||||
if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq()) {
|
||||
local_irq_restore(flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -315,16 +315,24 @@ static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!force_irqthreads)
|
||||
__do_softirq();
|
||||
else
|
||||
else {
|
||||
__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
|
||||
wakeup_softirqd();
|
||||
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
static inline void invoke_softirq(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!force_irqthreads)
|
||||
do_softirq();
|
||||
else
|
||||
else {
|
||||
__local_bh_disable((unsigned long)__builtin_return_address(0),
|
||||
SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
|
||||
wakeup_softirqd();
|
||||
__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user