mirror of
https://github.com/joel16/android_kernel_sony_msm8994_rework.git
synced 2024-11-23 20:09:51 +00:00
perf script: Fix format regression due to libtraceevent merge
Consider the commands: perf record -e sched:sched_switch -fo /tmp/perf.data -a -- sleep 1 perf script -i /tmp/perf.data In v3.4 the output has the form (lines wrapped here) perf 29214 [005] 821043.582596: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=29214 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/5 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 In 3.5 that same line has become: perf 29214 [005] 821043.582596: sched_switch: <...>-29214 [005] 0.000000000: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=29214 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/5 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 Note the duplicates in the output -- pid, cpu, event name. With this patch the v3.4 output is restored: perf 29214 [005] 821043.582596: sched_switch: prev_comm=perf prev_pid=29214 prev_prio=120 prev_state=S ==> next_comm=swapper/5 next_pid=0 next_prio=120 v3: Remove that pesky newline too. Output now matches v3.4 (pre-libtracevent). v2: Change print_trace_event function local to perf per Steve's comments. Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1339698977-68962-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
662f5cedb3
commit
76a8349dfd
@ -198,9 +198,8 @@ void print_trace_event(int cpu, void *data, int size)
|
||||
record.data = data;
|
||||
|
||||
trace_seq_init(&s);
|
||||
pevent_print_event(pevent, &s, &record);
|
||||
pevent_event_info(&s, event, &record);
|
||||
trace_seq_do_printf(&s);
|
||||
printf("\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void print_event(int cpu, void *data, int size, unsigned long long nsecs,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user