From 919d590f13c94c5465db723178e4b72200fd5f90 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:51:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] perf symbols: Fix dso__fprintf() print statement

Was ignoring the dso type (function vs. variable) and was therefore
printing bogus information.

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121120095101.GA5939@quad
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/dso.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.c b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
index d6d9a465acd..be437850edc 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/dso.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.c
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ size_t dso__fprintf(struct dso *dso, enum map_type type, FILE *fp)
 	if (dso->short_name != dso->long_name)
 		ret += fprintf(fp, "%s, ", dso->long_name);
 	ret += fprintf(fp, "%s, %sloaded, ", map_type__name[type],
-		       dso->loaded ? "" : "NOT ");
+		       dso__loaded(dso, type) ? "" : "NOT ");
 	ret += dso__fprintf_buildid(dso, fp);
 	ret += fprintf(fp, ")\n");
 	for (nd = rb_first(&dso->symbols[type]); nd; nd = rb_next(nd)) {