[PR #1715] [MERGED] feat(langgraph+lsd): custom encryption at rest #1786

Closed
opened 2026-02-17 17:22:43 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
Owner

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/pull/1715
Author: @cwlbraa
Created: 12/2/2025
Status: Merged
Merged: 1/7/2026
Merged by: @cwlbraa

Base: mainHead: cwlbraa/custom-encryption-LSD-172


📝 Commits (10+)

  • 87dd364 feat(langraph+lsd): custom encryption at rest
  • 096e36a full rework of examples
  • 0afab9e warning regarding migration
  • 03be1c8 update with encrypted approach for migration
  • afc19e2 user[tenant_id]
  • c7ee0d8 polish list of fields to leave unencrypted
  • 37fbc1d address josh's comments
  • 6781cbd fix what gets encrypted header nesting
  • 35cd9e2 document aes->custom migration behavior
  • 1df99d2 describe key preservation limitation, clarify migration note, and add perf roundtrip warning

📊 Changes

2 files changed (+405 additions, -0 deletions)

View changed files

📝 src/docs.json (+1 -0)
src/langsmith/encryption.mdx (+404 -0)

📄 Description

Overview

This PR documents new SDK annotations for injecting custom encryption at rest handlers in langsmith deployments.

Type of change

Type: New documentation page

Related issues/PRs

https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6482
https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph-api/pull/1773

  • Linear issue: LSD-172
  • Slack thread:

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing guidelines
  • I have tested my changes locally using docs dev
  • All code examples have been tested and work correctly
    • AWS example was tested against localstack
    • both were tested without a real langgraph-server but are similar enough to the custom_encryption.py test graph that we should be safe.
  • I have used root relative paths for internal links
  • I have updated navigation in src/docs.json if needed

(Internal team members only / optional): Create a preview deployment as necessary using the Create Preview Branch workflow

Additional notes


🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/pull/1715 **Author:** [@cwlbraa](https://github.com/cwlbraa) **Created:** 12/2/2025 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 1/7/2026 **Merged by:** [@cwlbraa](https://github.com/cwlbraa) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `cwlbraa/custom-encryption-LSD-172` --- ### 📝 Commits (10+) - [`87dd364`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/87dd364f0f15dee30f91f70a0f7fd4e8801d5372) feat(langraph+lsd): custom encryption at rest - [`096e36a`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/096e36ab80e94b259e6b8acf2e95b95d598c0ad9) full rework of examples - [`0afab9e`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/0afab9efcd35819c02b015247492025a2b963f41) warning regarding migration - [`03be1c8`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/03be1c82badcdc432e24abfb62a2946c4bfdd4cb) update with __encrypted__ approach for migration - [`afc19e2`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/afc19e26a9d81197a1ee2499e3f88aaadfd70630) user[tenant_id] - [`c7ee0d8`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/c7ee0d86d721432758795e653993f2086e30826d) polish list of fields to leave unencrypted - [`37fbc1d`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/37fbc1d67f6ea797f795da84dc07fc121474bd75) address josh's comments - [`6781cbd`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/6781cbdbd108598db5ac8a9effe6551780d714cc) fix what gets encrypted header nesting - [`35cd9e2`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/35cd9e24da73d6d2b1725bd4b9bdb7d501fc1b92) document aes->custom migration behavior - [`1df99d2`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/commit/1df99d25982eb250ed8255581204bfb2d2f0492d) describe key preservation limitation, clarify migration note, and add perf roundtrip warning ### 📊 Changes **2 files changed** (+405 additions, -0 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `src/docs.json` (+1 -0) ➕ `src/langsmith/encryption.mdx` (+404 -0) </details> ### 📄 Description ## Overview <!-- Brief description of what documentation is being added/updated --> This PR documents new SDK annotations for injecting custom encryption at rest handlers in langsmith deployments. ## Type of change **Type:** New documentation page ## Related issues/PRs https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph/pull/6482 https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph-api/pull/1773 <!-- For LangChain employees, if applicable: --> - Linear issue: [LSD-172](https://linear.app/langchain/issue/LSD-172/add-api-for-user-specific-run-and-storeitem-encryption) - Slack thread: ## Checklist <!-- Put an 'x' in all boxes that apply --> - [x] I have read the [contributing guidelines](README.md) - [x] I have tested my changes locally using `docs dev` - [x] All code examples have been tested and work correctly - AWS example was tested against localstack - both were tested without a real langgraph-server but are similar enough to the custom_encryption.py test graph that we should be safe. - [x] I have used **root relative** paths for internal links - [x] I have updated navigation in `src/docs.json` if needed (Internal team members only / optional): Create a preview deployment as necessary using the [Create Preview Branch workflow](https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/actions/workflows/create-preview-branch.yml) ## Additional notes <!-- Any other information that would be helpful for reviewers --> --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-17 17:22:43 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-17 17:22:44 -05:00
yindo changed title from [PR #1715] feat(langgraph+lsd): custom encryption at rest to [PR #1715] [MERGED] feat(langgraph+lsd): custom encryption at rest 2026-06-05 18:14:55 -04:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/docs#1786