LocalExecution and DockerExecution integration #4

Closed
opened 2026-02-16 07:16:29 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @ravediamond on GitHub (Apr 2, 2025).

Hello,

First, great work on the repo!

I'm currently using local execution for CodeAct and I'm switching to Docker execution.
I have written my own implementation using eval_fn.
But what do you think about adding implementation of the local executor and the docker executor in the repo ?
It would be more robust and secure.

What do you think ?

If needed, I can work on this first implementation.

Originally created by @ravediamond on GitHub (Apr 2, 2025). Hello, First, great work on the repo! I'm currently using local execution for CodeAct and I'm switching to Docker execution. I have written my own implementation using `eval_fn`. But what do you think about adding implementation of the local executor and the docker executor in the repo ? It would be more robust and secure. What do you think ? If needed, I can work on this first implementation.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 07:16:29 -05:00
Author
Owner

@eyurtsev commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2025):

Yes, mostly depends on how good the implementation is. I'm looking at sandboxing solutions right now, and will likely push them to a separate repository for code execution.

If you'd like to contribute feel free to open a draft PR w/ implementation to this repo. It'll be useful as a reference when implementing code sandboxing

@eyurtsev commented on GitHub (Apr 2, 2025): Yes, mostly depends on how good the implementation is. I'm looking at sandboxing solutions right now, and will likely push them to a separate repository for code execution. If you'd like to contribute feel free to open a draft PR w/ implementation to this repo. It'll be useful as a reference when implementing code sandboxing
Author
Owner

@ravediamond commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025):

Got it. If you’re already looking to do your own implementation, then I’ll step back from this. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with.

I’ll go ahead and close the issue—thanks for the reply.

@ravediamond commented on GitHub (Apr 3, 2025): Got it. If you’re already looking to do your own implementation, then I’ll step back from this. Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. I’ll go ahead and close the issue—thanks for the reply.
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/langgraph-codeact#4