[PR #3] Removing extra Finish class #5

New Issue

2026-02-16T04:15:52-05:00

yindo commented

2026-02-16 04:15:52 -05:00

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph-reflection/pull/3
Author: @marlenezw
Created: 3/21/2025
Status: 🔄 Open

Base: main ← Head: removing_tool_class

📝 Commits (1)

57e28d9 updating llm as a judge example.

📊 Changes

1 file changed (+0 additions, -7 deletions)

View changed files

📝 examples/llm_as_a_judge.py (+0 -7)

📄 Description

Openevals by default uses a bool as the tool for the judge so this class doesn't seem to be necessary. It doesn't stop the code from running but could potentially be confusing, so putting in a PR to remove it 😄

_{🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.}

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph-reflection/pull/3 **Author:** [@marlenezw](https://github.com/marlenezw) **Created:** 3/21/2025 **Status:** 🔄 Open **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `removing_tool_class` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`57e28d9`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph-reflection/commit/57e28d95beea9d1e7be582c89a1d7d525d7419ae) updating llm as a judge example. ### 📊 Changes **1 file changed** (+0 additions, -7 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `examples/llm_as_a_judge.py` (+0 -7) </details> ### 📄 Description Openevals by default uses a bool as the tool for the judge so this class doesn't seem to be necessary. It doesn't stop the code from running but could potentially be confusing, so putting in a PR to remove it 😄 --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>

yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-16 04:15:52 -05:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

1 Participants

Notifications

Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/langgraph-reflection#5