langchain-ai/langgraph
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph.git synced 2026-07-15 12:35:43 -04:00
Code Issues 314 Packages Projects Releases 17 Wiki Activity

Send parallel #1139

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-20 17:43:13 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-20 17:43:13 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @wangsiyu666 on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026).

Checked other resources

  • This is a bug, not a usage question.
  • I added a clear and descriptive title that summarizes this issue.
  • I used the GitHub search to find a similar question and didn't find it.
  • I am sure that this is a bug in LangGraph rather than my code.
  • The bug is not resolved by updating to the latest stable version of LangGraph (or the specific integration package).
  • This is not related to the langchain-community package.
  • I posted a self-contained, minimal, reproducible example. A maintainer can copy it and run it AS IS.

Reproduction Steps / Example Code (Python)

Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism?

Error Message and Stack Trace (if applicable)

Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism?

Description

Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism?

System Info

Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism?

Originally created by @wangsiyu666 on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026). ### Checked other resources - [x] This is a bug, not a usage question. - [x] I added a clear and descriptive title that summarizes this issue. - [x] I used the GitHub search to find a similar question and didn't find it. - [x] I am sure that this is a bug in LangGraph rather than my code. - [x] The bug is not resolved by updating to the latest stable version of LangGraph (or the specific integration package). - [x] This is not related to the langchain-community package. - [x] I posted a self-contained, minimal, reproducible example. A maintainer can copy it and run it AS IS. ### Reproduction Steps / Example Code (Python) ```python Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism? ``` ### Error Message and Stack Trace (if applicable) ```shell Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism? ``` ### Description Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism? ### System Info Does using Send to distribute tasks in langgraph achieve parallel scheduling? If a node internally performs I/O operations, is gathering still necessary to truly achieve parallelism?
yindo added the bug label 2026-02-20 17:43:13 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-20 17:43:13 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-20 17:43:13 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@hinthornw commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026):

Yes it is parallel.

https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/multi-agent/router-knowledge-base#parallel-execution-with-send

Why did you mark this question as a bug?

@hinthornw commented on GitHub (Feb 6, 2026): Yes it is parallel. https://docs.langchain.com/oss/python/langchain/multi-agent/router-knowledge-base#parallel-execution-with-send Why did you mark this question as a bug?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
agents
awaiting author revision
bug
change
chat models
checkpointer
ci
code quality
code quality
dependencies
documentation
drawing
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
maintainer
meta
missing information
not maintained by langchain
open-swe-auto
open-swe-max
open-swe-max-auto
pending
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
requires design
sdk
server
stale
studio
tests
type checking
usage question
v0.5
v1.1
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/langgraph#1139
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?