langchain-ai/langgraphjs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraphjs.git synced 2026-07-23 01:26:57 -04:00
Code Issues 108 Packages Projects Releases 20 Wiki Activity

[PR #502] [MERGED] fix(docs): typos #810

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-15 19:15:59 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-15 19:15:59 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

📋 Pull Request Information

Original PR: https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraphjs/pull/502
Author: @stevologic
Created: 9/21/2024
Status: ✅ Merged
Merged: 9/23/2024
Merged by: @jacoblee93

Base: main ← Head: docs_typo_fixes

📝 Commits (1)

  • 0b1692b fix: typo fixes in checkpointer and planning docs

📊 Changes

2 files changed (+2 additions, -2 deletions)

View changed files

📝 docs/docs/concepts/agentic_concepts.md (+1 -1)
📝 docs/docs/concepts/low_level.md (+1 -1)

📄 Description

Pull Request Overview

This PR addresses typos found in three sections of the LangGraph documentation, ensuring clarity and correctness of the text. The following sections were corrected:

1. Typo in Checkpointer section of "Low Level LangGraph Concepts"

Link: Checkpointer Section

  • Issue: Duplicated word "workflows."
  • Correction: Removed the extra "workflows" to improve readability.

2. Typo in Checkpointer section of "Low Level LangGraph Concepts"

Link: Checkpointer Section

  • Issue: "Has to be to resume execution" is incorrect.
  • Correction: Changed to "has to be able to resume execution" for clarity.

3. Typo in Planning section of "Common Agentic Patterns"

Link: Planning Section

  • Issue: Incorrect phrase "explicit planning this."
  • Correction: Changed to "explicit planning phase" for better accuracy.

🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.

## 📋 Pull Request Information **Original PR:** https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraphjs/pull/502 **Author:** [@stevologic](https://github.com/stevologic) **Created:** 9/21/2024 **Status:** ✅ Merged **Merged:** 9/23/2024 **Merged by:** [@jacoblee93](https://github.com/jacoblee93) **Base:** `main` ← **Head:** `docs_typo_fixes` --- ### 📝 Commits (1) - [`0b1692b`](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraphjs/commit/0b1692b204ba576155d0620d7de28eb5218ff774) fix: typo fixes in checkpointer and planning docs ### 📊 Changes **2 files changed** (+2 additions, -2 deletions) <details> <summary>View changed files</summary> 📝 `docs/docs/concepts/agentic_concepts.md` (+1 -1) 📝 `docs/docs/concepts/low_level.md` (+1 -1) </details> ### 📄 Description ### **Pull Request Overview** This PR addresses typos found in three sections of the LangGraph documentation, ensuring clarity and correctness of the text. The following sections were corrected: --- ### **1. Typo in Checkpointer section of "Low Level LangGraph Concepts"** **Link:** [Checkpointer Section](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraphjs/concepts/low_level/#checkpointer:~:text=First%2C%20checkpointers%20facilitate%20human%2Din%2Dthe%2Dloop%20workflows%20workflows%20by%20allowing%20humans%20to%20inspect%2C%20interrupt%2C%20and%20approve%20steps.) - **Issue:** Duplicated word "workflows." - **Correction:** Removed the extra "workflows" to improve readability. ### **2. Typo in Checkpointer section of "Low Level LangGraph Concepts"** **Link:** [Checkpointer Section](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraphjs/concepts/low_level/#checkpointer:~:text=Checkpointers%20are%20needed%20for%20these%20workflows%20as%20the%20human%20has%20to%20be%20able%20to%20view%20the%20state%20of%20a%20graph%20at%20any%20point%20in%20time%2C%20and%20the%20graph%20has%20to%20be%20to%20resume%20execution%20after%20the%20human%20has%20made%20any%20updates%20to%20the%20state.) - **Issue:** "Has to be to resume execution" is incorrect. - **Correction:** Changed to "has to be able to resume execution" for clarity. ### **3. Typo in Planning section of "Common Agentic Patterns"** **Link:** [Planning Section](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraphjs/concepts/agentic_concepts/#multi-agent:~:text=A%20common%20technique%20to%20overcome%20this%20is%20to%20have%20an%20explicit%20planning%20this) - **Issue:** Incorrect phrase "explicit planning this." - **Correction:** Changed to "explicit planning phase" for better accuracy. --- --- <sub>🔄 This issue represents a GitHub Pull Request. It cannot be merged through Gitea due to API limitations.</sub>
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-15 19:15:59 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-15 19:15:59 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
checkpointer
docs-needed
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
good writeup
help wanted
invalid
langgraph-supervisor
open-swe-auto
platform
prebuilt
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/langgraphjs#810
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?