Add "not exists" to filters. #21

Closed
opened 2026-02-21 17:16:59 -05:00 by yindo · 2 comments
Owner

Originally created by @henryxparker on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024).

I realize this is just the docs page but I searched around for a while to figure out where I could give feedback in the app and on official pages and couldn't find anything. So I'll just put it here. If you work at langchain, just send this to the people in charge of that and close this issue.

Langsmith filters needs a "not exists" filter option. It seems like a no-brainer add and shouldn't be too difficult to implement. What if I want to filter out traces that already have feedback for my action so we don't add feedback to a trace more than once. Just strikes me as a very basic filtering option

Originally created by @henryxparker on GitHub (Aug 7, 2024). I realize this is just the docs page but I searched around for a while to figure out where I could give feedback in the app and on official pages and couldn't find anything. So I'll just put it here. If you work at langchain, just send this to the people in charge of that and close this issue. Langsmith filters needs a "not exists" filter option. It seems like a no-brainer add and shouldn't be too difficult to implement. What if I want to filter out traces that already have feedback for my action so we don't add feedback to a trace more than once. Just strikes me as a very basic filtering option
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 17:16:59 -05:00
Author
Owner

@hinthornw commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024):

Ya I agree with the utility; the way the queries are executed on the analytical db make this a bit less trivial to implement at scale than what you'd imagine; not saying it's not something we'll support in the future, just a bit of context for why they weren't included in the original implementation.

@hinthornw commented on GitHub (Aug 13, 2024): Ya I agree with the utility; the way the queries are executed on the analytical db make this a bit less trivial to implement at scale than what you'd imagine; not saying it's not something we'll support in the future, just a bit of context for why they weren't included in the original implementation.
Author
Owner

@katmayb commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2025):

Thanks, closing this issue out. LangSmith docs have moved to a new repository: https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/issues

@katmayb commented on GitHub (Nov 18, 2025): Thanks, closing this issue out. LangSmith docs have moved to a new repository: https://github.com/langchain-ai/docs/issues
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langchain-ai/langsmith-docs#21