Thinking process closure option for qwen3 #354

Closed
opened 2026-02-16 10:19:06 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @zJunJie on GitHub (Jun 9, 2025).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

ollama already supports qwen3 active off think picking, when will dedify support it?

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @zJunJie on GitHub (Jun 9, 2025). ### Self Checks - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [x] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:) - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. ollama already supports qwen3 active off think picking, when will dedify support it? ### 2. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 10:19:06 -05:00
Author
Owner

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2025):

Hi, @zJunJie. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the dify-official-plugins team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested a "thinking process closure" feature for the qwen3 model, similar to what ollama offers.
  • You inquired about the timeline for this feature's implementation.
  • There has been no activity or response from maintainers regarding this request.
  • The issue remains unresolved with no updates or contributions so far.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this feature request is still relevant to the latest version of dify-official-plugins by commenting on this issue.
  • If I do not hear back within 5 days, I will automatically close this issue.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Aug 18, 2025): Hi, @zJunJie. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the dify-official-plugins team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You requested a "thinking process closure" feature for the qwen3 model, similar to what ollama offers. - You inquired about the timeline for this feature's implementation. - There has been no activity or response from maintainers regarding this request. - The issue remains unresolved with no updates or contributions so far. **Next Steps:** - Please let me know if this feature request is still relevant to the latest version of dify-official-plugins by commenting on this issue. - If I do not hear back within 5 days, I will automatically close this issue. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify-official-plugins#354