langgenius/dify-official-plugins
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify-official-plugins.git synced 2026-07-22 01:55:27 -04:00
Code Issues 54 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

SharePoint Plugin with Single Tenant Support #877

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-16 10:20:49 -05:00 by yindo · 3 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-16 10:20:49 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @jimmy0017 on GitHub (Dec 15, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @fatelei on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

Starting November 9th, 2020 end users will no longer be able to grant consent to newly registered multitenant apps without verified publishers. Add MPN ID to verify publisher

As we are using it internally in our organization, I would much rather to use singletenant instead of multitenant. Can we add support for tenant id instead of common for the sharepoint plugin?

2. Additional context or comments

No response

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @jimmy0017 on GitHub (Dec 15, 2025). Originally assigned to: @fatelei on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [x] I have read the [Contributing Guide](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542). - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify-official-plugins/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed. - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. > Starting November 9th, 2020 end users will no longer be able to grant consent to newly registered multitenant apps without verified publishers. [Add MPN ID to verify publisher](https://portal.azure.com/#) As we are using it internally in our organization, I would much rather to use singletenant instead of multitenant. Can we add support for tenant id instead of common for the sharepoint plugin? ### 2. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the enhancement label 2026-02-16 10:20:49 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-16 10:20:49 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-16 10:20:49 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025):

Hi, @jimmy0017. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the dify-official-plugins team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You requested adding single-tenant support to the SharePoint plugin by allowing a specific tenant ID instead of the default "common" multitenant setup.
  • This request is motivated by upcoming restrictions on multitenant app consent and your organization's internal requirements.
  • There have been no contributions or code changes offered to address this feature.
  • No activity or responses from the maintainers have occurred so far.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the dify-official-plugins repository by commenting here.
  • If I do not hear back within 5 days, I will automatically close this issue.

Thank you for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025): Hi, @jimmy0017. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the dify-official-plugins team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You requested adding single-tenant support to the SharePoint plugin by allowing a specific tenant ID instead of the default "common" multitenant setup. - This request is motivated by upcoming restrictions on multitenant app consent and your organization's internal requirements. - There have been no contributions or code changes offered to address this feature. - No activity or responses from the maintainers have occurred so far. **Next Steps:** - Please let me know if this issue is still relevant to the latest version of the dify-official-plugins repository by commenting here. - If I do not hear back within 5 days, I will automatically close this issue. Thank you for your understanding and contribution!
yindo commented 2026-02-16 10:20:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@jimmy0017 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025):

This is still relevant.

@jimmy0017 commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025): This is still relevant.
yindo commented 2026-02-16 10:20:50 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025):

@crazywoola The user has confirmed that the request for single-tenant support in the SharePoint plugin is still relevant and needs attention. Could you please assist with this issue?

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Dec 31, 2025): @crazywoola The user has confirmed that the request for single-tenant support in the SharePoint plugin is still relevant and needs attention. Could you please assist with this issue?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
bug
bug
dependencies
documentation
enhancement
good first issue
invalid
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
stale
No Label enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify-official-plugins#877
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?