langgenius/dify-plugins
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify-plugins.git synced 2026-07-22 01:55:36 -04:00
Code Issues 119 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Can we submit unpacked plugin files with the difypkg file? #6

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-22 17:15:29 -05:00 by yindo · 7 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:29 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @fdb02983rhy on GitHub (Mar 7, 2025).

It's difficult to check what changes were made in the PR if only difypkg was submitted.

Originally created by @fdb02983rhy on GitHub (Mar 7, 2025). It's difficult to check what changes were made in the PR if only difypkg was submitted.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-22 17:15:29 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:29 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@hjlarry commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025):

+1

@hjlarry commented on GitHub (Mar 10, 2025): +1
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@bowenliang123 commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025):

+1

@bowenliang123 commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025): +1
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@fdb02983rhy commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025):

@LogicOber Hi, please take it into consideration if possible.

@fdb02983rhy commented on GitHub (Mar 13, 2025): @LogicOber Hi, please take it into consideration if possible.
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@kurokobo commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025):

I agree with this proposal.

From a slightly different perspective, the current PR could be abused as a means of getting a maliciously crafted ZIP file to unzip on the reviewer's end.

For example, a ZIP file attached to an email from an unknown source is usually recommended to be discarded without unzipping, but in order to review the PRs in this repository, one has no choice but to unzip them at their own peril. This is not a very desirable situation.

@kurokobo commented on GitHub (Mar 14, 2025): I agree with this proposal. From a slightly different perspective, the current PR could be abused as a means of getting a maliciously crafted ZIP file to unzip on the reviewer's end. For example, a ZIP file attached to an email from an unknown source is usually recommended to be discarded without unzipping, but in order to review the PRs in this repository, one has no choice but to unzip them at their own peril. This is not a very desirable situation.
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@kevintsai1202 commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2025):

+1 Auto check also decompresses the file before checking. Why not upload the source code first, let the system complete the check, and then have it package the files?

@kevintsai1202 commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2025): +1 Auto check also decompresses the file before checking. Why not upload the source code first, let the system complete the check, and then have it package the files?
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@LogicOber commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2025):

Thank you everyone for your feedback and support. We have already discussed the relevant issues internally and will follow up on subsequent strategies as soon as possible. 💙

@LogicOber commented on GitHub (Apr 13, 2025): Thank you everyone for your feedback and support. We have already discussed the relevant issues internally and will follow up on subsequent strategies as soon as possible. 💙
yindo commented 2026-02-22 17:15:30 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026):

Hi @fdb02983rhy, thanks for opening this issue.

Why this is being closed

This issue tracker is reserved for actionable bugs/tasks. This report looks like a usage question.

Next steps

Please use the community channels instead:

If this is actually a bug/task, please open a new issue with clear reproducible details.

Thanks for understanding and for supporting Dify.

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Feb 3, 2026): Hi @fdb02983rhy, thanks for opening this issue. ### Why this is being closed This issue tracker is reserved for actionable bugs/tasks. This report looks like a usage question. ### Next steps Please use the community channels instead: - https://forum.dify.ai/ - https://discord.com/invite/FngNHpbcY7 If this is actually a bug/task, please open a new issue with clear reproducible details. Thanks for understanding and for supporting Dify.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Plugin Request
Plugin Request
Plugin Request
bug
duplicate
enhancement
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 question
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify-plugins#6
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?