langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Knoewledge batch add chunk function is not woking in QA mode and Chunk Settings report error when editing. #12034

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 19:05:24 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 19:05:24 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @szkane on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @WTW0313 on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • This is only for bug report, if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Dify version

1.1.2

Cloud or Self Hosted

Self Hosted (Docker)

Steps to reproduce

I redeployed a new dify 1.12 docker, and during the process of creating the knowledge base, I found that two features were not working properly, which prevented me from deploying down.
我重新部署了一个新的dify 1.12 docker，在创建知识库过程中，发现两个功能工作不正常，导致无法往下部署。

Bug1: batch add chunk function is not workding

STEP1. import empty.txt file and use Q&A format, then save.

Image

STEP2. Click batch add and there is no response.

Image

0.15.3 version could show a Q&A file upload window.

Bug2: update Chunk Settings get error 400, error code below:

{
    "code": "invalid_param",
    "message": "1 validation error for KnowledgeConfig\nretrieval_model.weights.weight_type\n  Field required [type=missing, input_value={'keyword_setting': {'key...ing_provider_name': ''}}, input_type=dict]\n    For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.9/v/missing",
    "status": 400
}

✔️ Expected Behavior

  1. batch add Q&A file via csv
  2. could be update when modify chunk setting

❌ Actual Behavior

No response

Originally created by @szkane on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025). Originally assigned to: @WTW0313 on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [x] This is only for bug report, if you would like to ask a question, please head to [Discussions](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/discussions/categories/general). - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [x] [FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue，否则会被关闭。谢谢！:) - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### Dify version 1.1.2 ### Cloud or Self Hosted Self Hosted (Docker) ### Steps to reproduce > I redeployed a new dify 1.12 docker, and during the process of creating the knowledge base, I found that two features were not working properly, which prevented me from deploying down. > 我重新部署了一个新的dify 1.12 docker，在创建知识库过程中，发现两个功能工作不正常，导致无法往下部署。 ## Bug1: batch add chunk function is not workding STEP1. import empty.txt file and use Q&A format, then save. ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76a2fd16-5719-4527-a02c-090762a999a6) STEP2. Click batch add and there is no response. ![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/93449f72-716e-4e29-a01d-525e2ce0a670) 0.15.3 version could show a Q&A file upload window. ## Bug2: update Chunk Settings get error 400, error code below: ``` { "code": "invalid_param", "message": "1 validation error for KnowledgeConfig\nretrieval_model.weights.weight_type\n Field required [type=missing, input_value={'keyword_setting': {'key...ing_provider_name': ''}}, input_type=dict]\n For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.9/v/missing", "status": 400 } ``` ### ✔️ Expected Behavior 1. batch add Q&A file via csv 2. could be update when modify chunk setting ### ❌ Actual Behavior _No response_
yindo added the 🐞 bug label 2026-02-21 19:05:24 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 19:05:24 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 19:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025):

The issues you're experiencing with the "batch add chunk" function not working in QA mode and the 400 error when updating Chunk Settings in Dify version 1.1.2 are due to a known bug in this version. The error message indicates a missing field required for the KnowledgeConfig, specifically retrieval_model.weights.weight_type. This issue occurs when uploading a second document to the knowledge base in versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.2, regardless of the file type.

This bug has been addressed in PR #16503 and will be fixed in the next version release. In the meantime, you can either wait for the update or revert to Dify version 1.1.0, where this issue does not occur [1][2].

To continue talking to Dosu, mention @dosu.

Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: Great Response | Irrelevant Answer | Incorrect Sources | Too Verbose | Hallucination | Bug Report | Other

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025): <!-- Answer --> The issues you're experiencing with the "batch add chunk" function not working in QA mode and the 400 error when updating Chunk Settings in Dify version 1.1.2 are due to a known bug in this version. The error message indicates a missing field required for the `KnowledgeConfig`, specifically `retrieval_model.weights.weight_type`. This issue occurs when uploading a second document to the knowledge base in versions 1.1.1 and 1.1.2, regardless of the file type. This bug has been addressed in PR #16503 and will be fixed in the next version release. In the meantime, you can either wait for the update or revert to Dify version 1.1.0, where this issue does not occur <sup>[[1]](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16591)</sup><sup>[[2]](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16520)</sup>. <!-- Dosu Comment Footer --> *To continue talking to [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), mention @dosu.* --- <sup>Help Dosu learn! Give it feedback: [Great Response](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=great_response) | [Irrelevant Answer](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=irrelevant_answer) | [Incorrect Sources](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=incorrect_sources) | [Too Verbose](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=too_verbose) | [Hallucination](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=hallucination) | [Bug Report](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=bug_report) | [Other](https://app.dosu.dev/response-feedback/f7b4cb90-3790-4b9a-9b54-7262bf7913de?feedback_type=other)</sup>
yindo commented 2026-02-21 19:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025):

See https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16609

Fixed in https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/16503

Duplicated

@crazywoola commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025): See https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16609 Fixed in https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/16503 Duplicated - https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16592 - https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16591 - https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16589 - https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16411 - https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/16142
yindo commented 2026-02-21 19:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@xuegao-tzx commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025):

Not fixed, still has issues in 1.1.3

Image Image
@xuegao-tzx commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025): Not fixed, still has issues in 1.1.3 <img width="369" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8fe7372c-a4d8-4d3b-90ec-da412ed2c7cc" /> <img width="495" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6aa0460-91dd-46f9-b9d1-890269ffd503" />
yindo commented 2026-02-21 19:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@WTW0313 commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025):

Bug2 should be fixed in version 1.1.3. Bug1 will be fixed soon.

@WTW0313 commented on GitHub (Mar 24, 2025): Bug2 should be fixed in version 1.1.3. Bug1 will be fixed soon.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 🐞 bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#12034
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?