langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 20:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Improve validation feedback for workflow graphs #19604

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:01:47 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:01:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @laipz8200 on GitHub (Oct 19, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @laipz8200 on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

When configuring complex workflow graphs with multiple conditional branches, the console currently accepts drafts that contain unreachable nodes or missing required connectors. These misconfigurations only surface at runtime as opaque errors, forcing users to rework their workflows without clear guidance.

2. Additional context or comments

Our support backlog now includes several tickets from teams who lost time debugging invalid graphs that slipped through authoring. We need clearer authoring feedback so builders know what to fix before deploying.

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.

Please limit one request per issue.

Originally created by @laipz8200 on GitHub (Oct 19, 2025). Originally assigned to: @laipz8200 on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [x] I have read the [Contributing Guide](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542). - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed. - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. When configuring complex workflow graphs with multiple conditional branches, the console currently accepts drafts that contain unreachable nodes or missing required connectors. These misconfigurations only surface at runtime as opaque errors, forcing users to rework their workflows without clear guidance. ### 2. Additional context or comments Our support backlog now includes several tickets from teams who lost time debugging invalid graphs that slipped through authoring. We need clearer authoring feedback so builders know what to fix before deploying. ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [x] I am interested in contributing to this feature. Please limit one request per issue.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement🌊 feat:workflow labels 2026-02-21 20:01:47 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:01:48 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 🌊 feat:workflow 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#19604
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?