[Refactor/Chore] Clarify InvokeFrom.Published naming for published pipeline runs #21476

Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:12:45 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
Owner

Originally created by @laipz8200 on GitHub (Jan 6, 2026).

Originally assigned to: @laipz8200 on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • This is only for refactors or chores; if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions.
  • I have searched for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交,否则会被关闭 :)
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Description

The InvokeFrom.Published enum name is ambiguous and makes it unclear that this source represents a published RAG pipeline run. This ambiguity makes it harder to understand invocation origins in pipeline-related flows.

Motivation

Clarifying the naming will make invocation sources explicit and reduce confusion when reading or reasoning about pipeline execution contexts.

Additional Context

This is purely a naming clarity request; the underlying value used in persisted data should remain unchanged for compatibility.

Originally created by @laipz8200 on GitHub (Jan 6, 2026). Originally assigned to: @laipz8200 on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [x] I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy. - [x] This is only for refactors or chores; if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions. - [x] I have searched for existing issues, including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed. - [x] 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交,否则会被关闭 :) - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### Description The `InvokeFrom.Published` enum name is ambiguous and makes it unclear that this source represents a published RAG pipeline run. This ambiguity makes it harder to understand invocation origins in pipeline-related flows. ### Motivation Clarifying the naming will make invocation sources explicit and reduce confusion when reading or reasoning about pipeline execution contexts. ### Additional Context This is purely a naming clarity request; the underlying value used in persisted data should remain unchanged for compatibility.
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:12:45 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#21476