langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-20 19:50:06 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[Refactor/Chore] Improve the way we organize our Zustand stores #21733

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-02-21 20:14:04 -05:00 by yindo · 1 comment
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:14:04 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @hyoban on GitHub (Jan 18, 2026).

Self Checks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide and Language Policy.
  • This is only for refactors or chores; if you would like to ask a question, please head to Discussions.
  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed.
  • 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交，否则会被关闭 ：）
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Description

  1. Move Store into a separate module
  2. Create a utility function for creating Stores that integrates common middleware
  3. Improve SSR support, avoiding the use of context patterns

Motivation

No response

Additional Context

No response

Originally created by @hyoban on GitHub (Jan 18, 2026). ### Self Checks - [x] I have read the [Contributing Guide](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) and [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542). - [x] This is only for refactors or chores; if you would like to ask a question, please head to [Discussions](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/discussions/categories/general). - [x] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [x] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report, otherwise it will be closed. - [x] 【中文用户 & Non English User】请使用英语提交，否则会被关闭 ：） - [x] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### Description 1. Move Store into a separate module 2. Create a utility function for creating Stores that integrates common middleware 3. Improve SSR support, avoiding the use of context patterns ### Motivation _No response_ ### Additional Context _No response_
yindo added the stale label 2026-02-21 20:14:04 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:14:04 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2026):

Hi, @hyoban. I'm Dosu, and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale.

Issue Summary:

  • You proposed refactoring Zustand stores by moving them to a dedicated module.
  • Suggested adding a utility function for common middleware integration.
  • Recommended improving server-side rendering support to avoid reliance on context patterns.
  • No further comments or updates have been made on this suggestion.

Next Steps:

  • Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of Dify by commenting here.
  • If I don’t hear back within 15 days, this issue will be automatically closed.

Thanks for your understanding and contribution!

@dosubot[bot] commented on GitHub (Feb 18, 2026): Hi, @hyoban. I'm [Dosu](https://dosu.dev), and I'm helping the Dify team manage their backlog and am marking this issue as stale. **Issue Summary:** - You proposed refactoring Zustand stores by moving them to a dedicated module. - Suggested adding a utility function for common middleware integration. - Recommended improving server-side rendering support to avoid reliance on context patterns. - No further comments or updates have been made on this suggestion. **Next Steps:** - Please let me know if this issue is still relevant with the latest version of Dify by commenting here. - If I don’t hear back within 15 days, this issue will be automatically closed. Thanks for your understanding and contribution!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label stale
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#21733
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?