langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Choose Model for Autoprompt feature (RULE_CONFIG_GENERATE_TEMPLATE) #2178

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 17:42:38 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:42:38 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @AndyMik90 on GitHub (Apr 12, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @VincePotato on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • Pleas do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing?

Since some of the models (especially local models) have a hard time to output correct json format for the autoprompt feature (RULE_CONFIG_GENERATE_TEMPLATE prompt), I suggest being able to set the model for this feature by itself in system settings. As now it uses the system LLM, and for some users, that is not the best for creating prompts in correct format.

2. Describe the feature you'd like to see

Set the model for the prompts in the llm_generate, especially the RULE_CONFIG_GENERATE_TEMPLATE one.

3. How will this feature improve your workflow or experience?

It would allow us not to have 400 errors from some models when they are set as the system-wide LLM, and users would always get orchestrated the prompt when using the automatic feature.

4. Additional context or comments

No response

5. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @AndyMik90 on GitHub (Apr 12, 2024). Originally assigned to: @VincePotato on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] Pleas do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Since some of the models (especially local models) have a hard time to output correct json format for the autoprompt feature (RULE_CONFIG_GENERATE_TEMPLATE prompt), I suggest being able to set the model for this feature by itself in system settings. As now it uses the system LLM, and for some users, that is not the best for creating prompts in correct format. ### 2. Describe the feature you'd like to see Set the model for the prompts in the llm_generate, especially the RULE_CONFIG_GENERATE_TEMPLATE one. ### 3. How will this feature improve your workflow or experience? It would allow us not to have 400 errors from some models when they are set as the system-wide LLM, and users would always get orchestrated the prompt when using the automatic feature. ### 4. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 5. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancementstale labels 2026-02-21 17:42:38 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 17:42:38 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label stale 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#2178
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?