langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 03:55:25 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #2718] fix typo: responsing -> responding #23800

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:21:47 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:21:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/2718

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Description

response is an noun so there is no such word called 'responsing'. Should use responding instead

Fixes # (issue)

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document

How Has This Been Tested?

did some smoke test. seems to work :)

  • TODO

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods
  • optional I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • optional I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • optional New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/2718 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- # Description *response* is an noun so there is no such word called 'responsing'. Should use *responding* instead Fixes # (issue) ## Type of Change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality) - [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected) - [ ] This change requires a documentation update, included: [Dify Document](https://github.com/langgenius/dify-docs) # How Has This Been Tested? did some smoke test. seems to work :) - [ ] TODO # Suggested Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [ ] I ran `dev/reformat`(backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged`(frontend) to appease the lint gods - [ ] `optional` I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] `optional` I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] `optional` New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:21:47 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:21:47 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#23800
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?