langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 20:15:31 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #5257] fix(core): Reorder field_validator and classmethod to fit Pydantic V2. #24843

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:23:47 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:23:47 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/5257

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Description

  1. Move the @classmethod below. See reference
  2. Add preview = true to the ruff lint configuration.
  3. Fix the Pydantic validation error in HttpRequestNodeData

Fixes # (issue)

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvement, including but not limited to code refactoring, performance optimization, and UI/UX improvement

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • By running test srcipts.

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods
  • optional I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • optional I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • optional New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/5257 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- # Description 1. Move the `@classmethod` below. [See reference](https://docs.pydantic.dev/2.7/concepts/validators/#field-validators) 2. Add `preview = true` to the ruff lint configuration. 3. Fix the Pydantic validation error in `HttpRequestNodeData` Fixes # (issue) ## Type of Change Please delete options that are not relevant. - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] Improvement, including but not limited to code refactoring, performance optimization, and UI/UX improvement # How Has This Been Tested? Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration - [x] By running test srcipts. # Suggested Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I ran `dev/reformat`(backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged`(frontend) to appease the lint gods - [ ] `optional` I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] `optional` I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] `optional` New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:23:47 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:23:47 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#24843
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?