[PR #5606] fix: DuckDuckGo image search tool error #24993

Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:24:04 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
Owner

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/5606

State: closed
Merged: Yes


Description

  1. Fixes https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/5244. As the doc described, we should pass IDs instead of Model objects to avoid DetachedInstanceError.
  2. Now the image search results will not be downloaded. For agent mode, the images display well. For workflow mode, I add a remote_url field in the files response to avoid affect others.

1719371661878

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Improvement, including but not limited to code refactoring, performance optimization, and UI/UX improvement

How Has This Been Tested?

I test it locally.

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods
  • optional I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • optional I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • optional New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/5606 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- # Description 1. Fixes https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/5244. As the [doc](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/api/core/app/apps/README.md) described, we should pass IDs instead of Model objects to avoid DetachedInstanceError. 2. Now the image search results will not be downloaded. For agent mode, the images display well. For workflow mode, I add a `remote_url` field in the files response to avoid affect others. ![1719371661878](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/assets/25834719/b6e4b60c-9322-48bf-a540-a9ffe25d9f21) ## Type of Change - [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue) - [x] Improvement, including but not limited to code refactoring, performance optimization, and UI/UX improvement # How Has This Been Tested? I test it locally. # Suggested Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [x] My changes generate no new warnings - [x] I ran `dev/reformat`(backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged`(frontend) to appease the lint gods - [ ] `optional` I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] `optional` I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works - [ ] `optional` New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:24:04 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:24:04 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#24993