langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Evaluate and test apps with dify and view reports #3016

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 17:52:46 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 17:52:46 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @Alvin-Yin on GitHub (May 8, 2024).

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • Pleas do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing?

At present, if you want to evaluate applications, workflows, or bare models, you can only manually evaluate them. This aspect can be platformized.

2. Describe the feature you'd like to see

Coze has an evaluation function that supports rule management, dataset management, use case management, and report management. The rules include the basic rules of is / not, code execution, model evaluation (such as consciousness +, detail+), this is a great feature, do we have relevant planning

3. How will this feature improve your workflow or experience?

Better, faster and easier maintenance of applications, workflows, or bare models‘ evaluation and testing, and have reports

4. Additional context or comments

No response

5. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @Alvin-Yin on GitHub (May 8, 2024). ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] Pleas do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? At present, if you want to evaluate applications, workflows, or bare models, you can only manually evaluate them. This aspect can be platformized. ### 2. Describe the feature you'd like to see Coze has an evaluation function that supports rule management, dataset management, use case management, and report management. The rules include the basic rules of is / not, code execution, model evaluation (such as consciousness +, detail+), this is a great feature, do we have relevant planning ### 3. How will this feature improve your workflow or experience? Better, faster and easier maintenance of applications, workflows, or bare models‘ evaluation and testing, and have reports ### 4. Additional context or comments _No response_ ### 5. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 17:52:46 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 17:52:46 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#3016
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?