langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-21 12:05:30 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #28527] fix: use default values for optional workflow input variables (#28546) #32074

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:50:42 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:50:42 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/28527

State: closed
Merged: Yes

When calling workflow API with missing optional fields, they should use configured default values instead of becoming null.

Changes:

  • Add default field to VariableEntity model
  • Update _validate_inputs to pass default values through validation pipeline
  • Ensure string number defaults (e.g., "123") are converted to proper types
  • Add comprehensive test coverage for all supported variable types:
    • TEXT_INPUT, PARAGRAPH, SELECT - string defaults
    • NUMBER - int/float/string-formatted number defaults with type conversion
    • CHECKBOX - boolean defaults
    • FILE, FILE_LIST - object/array defaults

Fixes https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/28546

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Important

  1. Make sure you have read our contribution guidelines
  2. Ensure there is an associated issue and you have been assigned to it
  3. Use the correct syntax to link this PR: Fixes #<issue number>.

Summary

close [#28546 ]

Screenshots

Before After
... ...

Checklist

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/28527 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- When calling workflow API with missing optional fields, they should use configured default values instead of becoming null. Changes: - Add default field to VariableEntity model - Update _validate_inputs to pass default values through validation pipeline - Ensure string number defaults (e.g., "123") are converted to proper types - Add comprehensive test coverage for all supported variable types: * TEXT_INPUT, PARAGRAPH, SELECT - string defaults * NUMBER - int/float/string-formatted number defaults with type conversion * CHECKBOX - boolean defaults * FILE, FILE_LIST - object/array defaults Fixes https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/28546 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) > [!IMPORTANT] > > 1. Make sure you have read our [contribution guidelines](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md) > 1. Ensure there is an associated issue and you have been assigned to it > 1. Use the correct syntax to link this PR: `Fixes #<issue number>`. ## Summary close [#28546 ] ## Screenshots | Before | After | |--------|-------| | ... | ... | ## Checklist - [ ] This change requires a documentation update, included: [Dify Document](https://github.com/langgenius/dify-docs) - [x] I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!) - [x] I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change. - [x] I've updated the documentation accordingly. - [x] I ran `dev/reformat`(backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged`(frontend) to appease the lint gods
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:50:42 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:50:42 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#32074
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?