langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-07-22 20:45:26 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

[PR #28803] refactor(workflow): remove redundant get_base_node_data() method #32185

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 20:50:55 -05:00 by yindo · 0 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 20:50:55 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Original Pull Request: https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/28803

State: closed
Merged: Yes

Fixes #28802

Summary

This PR removes the redundant get_base_node_data() method from the Node class and replaces all usages with the existing node_data property.

Changes:

  • Remove get_base_node_data() method from api/core/workflow/nodes/base/node.py
  • Update all call sites in the Node class to use self.node_data instead
  • Update tests to use the node_data property

Screenshots

N/A - No UI changes

Checklist

  • This change requires a documentation update, included: Dify Document
  • I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!)
  • I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change.
  • I've updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I ran dev/reformat(backend) and cd web && npx lint-staged(frontend) to appease the lint gods
**Original Pull Request:** https://github.com/langgenius/dify/pull/28803 **State:** closed **Merged:** Yes --- Fixes #28802 ## Summary This PR removes the redundant `get_base_node_data()` method from the `Node` class and replaces all usages with the existing `node_data` property. **Changes:** - Remove `get_base_node_data()` method from `api/core/workflow/nodes/base/node.py` - Update all call sites in the Node class to use `self.node_data` instead - Update tests to use the `node_data` property ## Screenshots N/A - No UI changes ## Checklist - [ ] This change requires a documentation update, included: [Dify Document](https://github.com/langgenius/dify-docs) - [x] I understand that this PR may be closed in case there was no previous discussion or issues. (This doesn't apply to typos!) - [x] I've added a test for each change that was introduced, and I tried as much as possible to make a single atomic change. - [x] I've updated the documentation accordingly. - [x] I ran `dev/reformat`(backend) and `cd web && npx lint-staged`(frontend) to appease the lint gods
yindo added the pull-request label 2026-02-21 20:50:55 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 20:50:55 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label pull-request
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#32185
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?