langgenius/dify
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/langgenius/dify.git synced 2026-08-25 11:59:42 -04:00
Code Issues 775 Packages Projects Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Pass input parameters to iframe #4254

New Issue
Closed
opened 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00 by yindo · 4 comments
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Originally created by @jarednieder on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @crazywoola on GitHub.

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.

Same request as this closed issue, there seems to be no simple way to pass data to user input fields when embedding an iframe. The current implementation has poor user experience as the user must type in some text which could be easily pre-filled.

2. Additional context or comments

Even better than pre-filling inputs would be to pre-fill inputs and start the chat if all required inputs are present.

3. Can you help us with this feature?

  • I am interested in contributing to this feature.
Originally created by @jarednieder on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024). Originally assigned to: @crazywoola on GitHub. ### Self Checks - [X] I have searched for existing issues [search for existing issues](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues), including closed ones. - [X] I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 [Language Policy](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/1542)). - [X] Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields. ### 1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story. Same request as [this closed issue](https://github.com/langgenius/dify/issues/2841), there seems to be no simple way to pass data to user input fields when embedding an iframe. The current implementation has poor user experience as the user must type in some text which could be easily pre-filled. ### 2. Additional context or comments Even better than pre-filling inputs would be to pre-fill inputs _and_ start the chat if all required inputs are present. ### 3. Can you help us with this feature? - [ ] I am interested in contributing to this feature.
yindo added the 💪 enhancement label 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
yindo closed this issue 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@webserviceXXL commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024):

Would love this feature, too. 😍 Pre-filling the inputs by GET parameters would be nice.

@webserviceXXL commented on GitHub (Jun 25, 2024): Would love this feature, too. 😍 Pre-filling the inputs by GET parameters would be nice.
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@ivanseidel commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2024):

This is an awesome feature. Receiving this context as "hidden" params as well would benefit more complex and specific purpose applications using dify's workflow

@ivanseidel commented on GitHub (Jul 12, 2024): This is an awesome feature. Receiving this context as "hidden" params as well would benefit more complex and specific purpose applications using dify's workflow
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@diegotiemann commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2024):

I need this feeature too!

@diegotiemann commented on GitHub (Nov 15, 2024): I need this feeature too!
yindo commented 2026-02-21 18:05:25 -05:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

@charli-polo commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024):

+1 😄

@charli-polo commented on GitHub (Dec 30, 2024): +1 😄
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
Knowledge Pipeline
Proposal
WIP
cloud
dependencies
feat:webapp
good first issue
outdated
performance
pull-request
Mirrored from GitHub Pull Request
 python:uv
refactor
size:L
stale
status: accepting prs
status: blocked
status: in discussion
stt & tts
vulnerablity
web
wont-fix
🌊 feat:workflow
🌚 invalid
🐞 bug
👻 feat:rag
💪 enhancement
📚 documentation
🔨 feat:tools
🙋‍♂️ question
🙏 help wanted
🤔 cant-reproduce
🤖 feat:agent
No Label 💪 enhancement
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
yindo
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: langgenius/dify#4254
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?